Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Comparison of the diagnostic values of circulating steroid hormones, VEGF-A, PIGF, and ADAM12 in women with ectopic pregnancy.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • المؤلفون: Zou S;Zou S; Li X; Feng Y; Sun S; Li J; Egecioglu E; Billig H; Shao R
  • المصدر:
    Journal of translational medicine [J Transl Med] 2013 Feb 19; Vol. 11, pp. 44. Date of Electronic Publication: 2013 Feb 19.
  • نوع النشر :
    Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • اللغة:
    English
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101190741 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1479-5876 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14795876 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Transl Med Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, 2003-
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Background: Several peripheral proteins that might be useful for detecting the presence of ectopic pregnancy (EP) have been evaluated, but none have been proven entirely useful in the clinic. We investigated the presence and the possible changes in circulating molecules that distinguish between normal intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) and tubal ectopic pregnancy.
      Methods: Non-pregnant women during the menstrual cycle, women with IUP, and women with tubal EP after informed consent. Serum levels of 17β-estradiol (E2), progesterone (P4), testosterone (T), beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), placental growth factor (PIGF), and a distintegrin and metalloprotease protein 12 (ADAM12) were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the diagnostic discrimination of EP and gestational age-matched IUP.
      Results: E2, P4, PIGF, and ADAM12 levels increased and β-hCG decreased throughout IUP. E2 and VEGF-A levels were significantly different between women with tubal EP and IUP. However, using a serum β-hCG cut-off of less than 1000 mIU/mL, P4 was significantly lower in women with tubal EP compared to IUP. Although E2 was inversely correlated with VEGF-A in women in the early stages of IUP, E2 was not correlated with VEGF-A in women with EP prior to tubal surgery. There were no significant differences in either PIGF or ADAM12 alone between women with tubal EP or IUP. Although no significant correlations were seen between E2 and PIGF or P4 and ADAM12 in women in the early stages of IUP, E2 was positively correlated with PIGF and P4 was positively correlated with ADAM12 in women with EP prior to tubal surgery. Our studies defined associations but not causality.
      Conclusions: Individual measurements of serum E2 or VEGF-A levels are strongly related to early pregnancy outcomes for women with IUP and EP, and pregnancy-associated E2 and VEGF-A levels provide diagnostic accuracy for the presence of tubal EP. This study demonstrates that correlation analysis of E2/VEGF-A and E2/PIGF serum levels may be able to distinguish a tubal EP from a normal IUP.
    • References:
      J Proteome Res. 2011 Mar 4;10(3):1126-38. (PMID: 21142075)
      Fertil Steril. 2010 Oct;94(5):1595-600. (PMID: 20004374)
      Minerva Ginecol. 2010 Feb;62(1):49-62. (PMID: 20186114)
      Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1022:306-16. (PMID: 15251976)
      Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2011 Nov;11(8):759-62. (PMID: 22022935)
      Hum Reprod Update. 2012 Jul;18(4):436-57. (PMID: 22495259)
      Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008;40(9):1685-702. (PMID: 18342566)
      Fertil Steril. 2004 Apr;81(4):1106-11. (PMID: 15066471)
      J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Sep;96(9):E1444-51. (PMID: 21715541)
      Hum Reprod Update. 2010 Jul-Aug;16(4):432-44. (PMID: 20071358)
      Lancet. 2005 Aug 13-19;366(9485):583-91. (PMID: 16099295)
      Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45. (PMID: 3203132)
      Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2008 Oct;63(5):701-8. (PMID: 18925333)
      Fertil Steril. 2006 Apr;85 Suppl 1:1097-102. (PMID: 16616080)
      Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008 Dec;13(4):431-7. (PMID: 19117260)
      Hum Reprod. 2005 Nov;20(11):3163-6. (PMID: 16055453)
      J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 May;96(5):E869-77. (PMID: 21346072)
      J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1996 Aug;96(8):461-4. (PMID: 8810156)
      J Endocrinol. 1998 Dec;159(3):459-67. (PMID: 9834463)
      Mol Hum Reprod. 2010 Dec;16(12):907-15. (PMID: 20647263)
      Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975 May;122(2):262-3. (PMID: 1155504)
      Fertil Steril. 2004 Sep;82(3):686-90. (PMID: 15374715)
      J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Dec;94(12):5146-54. (PMID: 19864448)
      Reproduction. 2009 Jul;138(1):9-22. (PMID: 19321656)
      Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;117(3):573-582. (PMID: 21343760)
      Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Mar;7(3):185-99. (PMID: 16485018)
      Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 15;95(4):1373-8. (PMID: 21277576)
      Fertil Steril. 1999 Dec;72(6):1013-7. (PMID: 10593373)
      Clin Chem. 1993 Apr;39(4):561-77. (PMID: 8472349)
      Fertil Steril. 2012 Nov;98(5):1175-85. (PMID: 22884019)
      Hum Reprod. 2002 Dec;17(12):3231-4. (PMID: 12456629)
      J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996 Jan;81(1):353-9. (PMID: 8550777)
      Mol Hum Reprod. 2006 Jun;12(6):367-75. (PMID: 16648151)
      Fertil Steril. 2004 Aug;82(2):309-13. (PMID: 15302276)
      Biol Reprod. 2003 May;68(5):1870-6. (PMID: 12606391)
      Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2012 May 1;302(10):E1269-82. (PMID: 22436695)
      J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jan;96(1):E104-8. (PMID: 21047920)
      Hum Reprod. 2006 Sep;21(9):2281-9. (PMID: 16763010)
      Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39(1):57-64. (PMID: 22675957)
      Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Jun;278(6):E1038-44. (PMID: 10827006)
      Gynecol Endocrinol. 2006 Sep;22(9):495-500. (PMID: 17071533)
      PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e41442. (PMID: 22927907)
      J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2006 Jul;13(5):368-71. (PMID: 16713312)
      BMJ. 2011 Jun 10;342:d3397. (PMID: 21665933)
      Biol Reprod. 2012 Apr 27;86(4):131. (PMID: 22357544)
      N Engl J Med. 2009 Jul 23;361(4):379-87. (PMID: 19625718)
      Hum Reprod. 2002 Feb;17(2):490-2. (PMID: 11821301)
      Am J Transl Res. 2012;4(3):269-78. (PMID: 22937205)
      Hum Reprod. 2010 Mar;25(3):584-7. (PMID: 20023297)
      Hum Reprod. 2003 Nov;18(11):2264-9. (PMID: 14585871)
      Mol Pharmacol. 2006 Nov;70(5):1469-80. (PMID: 16887934)
      Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 May 27;100(11):6517-22. (PMID: 12754377)
    • الرقم المعرف:
      0 (Gonadal Steroid Hormones)
      0 (Membrane Proteins)
      0 (PGF protein, human)
      0 (Pregnancy Proteins)
      0 (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A)
      144589-93-5 (Placenta Growth Factor)
      EC 3.4.24.- (ADAM Proteins)
      EC 3.4.24.- (ADAM12 Protein)
      EC 3.4.24.- (ADAM12 protein, human)
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20130221 Date Completed: 20130809 Latest Revision: 20211021
    • الموضوع:
      20231215
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC3585714
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1186/1479-5876-11-44
    • الرقم المعرف:
      23421942