In vitro quantification of the performance of model-based mono-planar and bi-planar fluoroscopy for 3D joint kinematics estimation.

Publisher: Springer Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 7704869 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1741-0444 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 01400118 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Med Biol Eng Comput Subsets: MEDLINE

Publication: New York, NY : Springer
Original Publication: Stevenage, Eng., Peregrinus.

Models, Biological*; Fluoroscopy/*instrumentation ; Fluoroscopy/*methods ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional/*methods ; Knee Joint/*diagnostic imaging; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Humans ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radiostereometric Analysis

Model-based mono-planar and bi-planar 3D fluoroscopy methods can quantify intact joints kinematics with performance/cost trade-off. The aim of this study was to compare the performances of mono- and bi-planar setups to a marker-based gold-standard, during dynamic phantom knee acquisitions. Absolute pose errors for in-plane parameters were lower than 0.6 mm or 0.6° for both mono- and bi-planar setups. Mono-planar setups resulted critical in quantifying the out-of-plane translation (error < 6.5 mm), and bi-planar in quantifying the rotation along bone longitudinal axis (error < 1.3°). These errors propagated to joint angles and translations differently depending on the alignment of the anatomical axes and the fluoroscopic reference frames. Internal-external rotation was the least accurate angle both with mono- (error < 4.4°) and bi-planar (error < 1.7°) setups, due to bone longitudinal symmetries. Results highlighted that accuracy for mono-planar in-plane pose parameters is comparable to bi-planar, but with halved computational costs, halved segmentation time and halved ionizing radiation dose. Bi-planar analysis better compensated for the out-of-plane uncertainty that is differently propagated to relative kinematics depending on the setup. To take its full benefits, the motion task to be investigated should be designed to maintain the joint inside the visible volume introducing constraints with respect to mono-planar analysis.

J Biomech. 2003 Jun;36(6):873-82. (PMID: 12742455)
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003 Dec;22(12):1561-74. (PMID: 14649746)
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Mar;20(3):320-9. (PMID: 15698706)
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Aug;31(8):1573-83. (PMID: 22547454)
J Biomech. 2008 Dec 5;41(16):3384-9. (PMID: 18995859)
Knee. 2010 Jun;17(3):204-9. (PMID: 19864145)
J Arthroplasty. 2009 Jun;24(4):594-606. (PMID: 18676114)
J Orthop Res. 2007 Jul;25(7):867-72. (PMID: 17290431)
J Biomech Eng. 2006 Aug;128(4):604-9. (PMID: 16813452)
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1996 Jun;43(6):638-49. (PMID: 8987268)
J Biomech. 2011 Apr 7;44(6):1182-8. (PMID: 21296352)
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2008 Dec;46(12):1253-62. (PMID: 18825425)
J Biomech. 2011 Feb 24;44(4):784-7. (PMID: 21092967)
J Biomech Eng. 2006 Aug;128(4):588-95. (PMID: 16813450)
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999 Oct;18(10):981-91. (PMID: 10628957)
J Biomech. 2011 Jun 3;44(9):1757-64. (PMID: 21536291)
Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Jun;8(2):135-60. (PMID: 10501650)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Nov;464:205-9. (PMID: 18062052)
J Biomech. 2002 Apr;35(4):543-8. (PMID: 11934426)
Gait Posture. 2011 Mar;33(3):379-84. (PMID: 21227694)
Med Phys. 2010 Mar;37(3):1273-84. (PMID: 20384265)
Med Eng Phys. 2012 Nov;34(9):1303-9. (PMID: 22285714)
Med Phys. 2009 Jul;36(7):3176-80. (PMID: 19673216)
J Orthop Surg Res. 2008 Sep 04;3:38. (PMID: 18771582)
J Biomech. 2002 Jan;35(1):69-79. (PMID: 11747885)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Jan;454:66-73. (PMID: 17091011)
Med Phys. 1997 Dec;24(12):1875-88. (PMID: 9434970)
J Biomech. 2010 May 7;43(7):1292-301. (PMID: 20206357)
J Biomech. 2008;41(7):1616-22. (PMID: 18394629)
J Biomech. 2007;40 Suppl 1:S18-24. (PMID: 17462655)
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Jun;20(6):514-25. (PMID: 11437111)
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1998 Apr;13(3):204-215. (PMID: 11415789)
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Nov;90 Suppl 4:112-20. (PMID: 18984724)
J Biomech Eng. 2009 Apr;131(4):041004. (PMID: 19275433)
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997 Dec;44(12):1165-74. (PMID: 9401217)
Acta Orthop. 2005 Aug;76(4):563-72. (PMID: 16195075)
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2117-29. (PMID: 21737834)
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004 May;23(5):602-12. (PMID: 15147013)
J Biomech. 2005 Feb;38(2):241-53. (PMID: 15598450)
J Biomech. 1993 Dec;26(12):1473-7. (PMID: 8308052)
J Biomech Eng. 1983 May;105(2):136-44. (PMID: 6865355)
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 Feb;39(2):90-104. (PMID: 19194022)
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Oct;(331):107-17. (PMID: 8895626)
J Biomech Eng. 2005 Aug;127(4):692-9. (PMID: 16121540)
J Biomech Eng. 2011 Dec;133(12):121002. (PMID: 22206419)
J Orthop Res. 2001 Nov;19(6):1162-7. (PMID: 11781019)
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Sep;26(6):914-8. (PMID: 20870383)

Date Created: 20121113 Date Completed: 20131119 Latest Revision: 20211021

20221213

10.1007/s11517-012-0987-4

23143478