Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Handover patterns: an observational study of critical care physicians.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • المؤلفون: Ilan R;Ilan R; LeBaron CD; Christianson MK; Heyland DK; Day A; Cohen MD
  • المصدر:
    BMC health services research [BMC Health Serv Res] 2012 Jan 10; Vol. 12, pp. 11. Date of Electronic Publication: 2012 Jan 10.
  • نوع النشر :
    Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • اللغة:
    English
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101088677 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1472-6963 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14726963 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Health Serv Res Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Background: Handover (or 'handoff') is the exchange of information between health professionals that accompanies the transfer of patient care. This process can result in adverse events. Handover 'best practices', with emphasis on standardization, have been widely promoted. However, these recommendations are based mostly on expert opinion and research on medical trainees. By examining handover communication of experienced physicians, we aim to inform future research, education and quality improvement. Thus, our objective is to describe handover communication patterns used by attending critical care physicians in an academic centre and to compare them with currently popular, standardized schemes for handover communication.
      Methods: Prospective, observational study using video recording in an academic intensive care unit in Ontario, Canada. Forty individual patient handovers were randomly selected out of 10 end-of-week handover sessions of attending physicians. Two coders independently reviewed handover transcripts documenting elements of three communication schemes: SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendations); SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan); and a standard medical admission note. Frequency and extent of questions asked by incoming physicians were measured as well. Analysis consisted of descriptive statistics.
      Results: Mean (± standard deviation) duration of patient-specific handovers was 2 min 58 sec (± 57 sec). The majority of handovers' content consisted of recent and current patient status. The remainder included physicians' interpretations and advice. Questions posed by the incoming physicians accounted for 5.8% (± 3.9%) of the handovers' content. Elements of all three standardized communication schemes appeared repeatedly throughout the handover dialogs with no consistent pattern. For example, blocks of SOAP's Assessment appeared 5.2 (± 3.0) times in patient handovers; they followed Objective blocks in only 45.9% of the opportunities and preceded Plan in just 21.8%. Certain communication elements were occasionally absent. For example, SBAR's Recommendation and admission note information about the patient's Past Medical History were absent from 22 (55.0%) and 20 (50.0%), respectively, of patient handovers.
      Conclusions: Clinical handover practice of faculty-level critical care physicians did not conform to any of the three predefined structuring schemes. Further research is needed to examine whether alternative approaches to handover communication can be identified and to identify features of high-quality handover communication.
    • References:
      Am J Med Qual. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):196-204. (PMID: 19269930)
      J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Oct;22(10):1470-4. (PMID: 17674110)
      Med Clin North Am. 2008 Mar;92(2):315-24, viii. (PMID: 18298981)
      J Neurosci Nurs. 1987 Oct;19(5):266-70. (PMID: 2960760)
      Health Manag Technol. 2008 Jul;29(7):30-1. (PMID: 18666521)
      Ann Intern Med. 2006 Oct 17;145(8):592-8. (PMID: 17043341)
      Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Aug;18(4):248-55. (PMID: 19651926)
      Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Dec;14(6):401-7. (PMID: 16326783)
      Acad Med. 2009 Dec;84(12):1775-87. (PMID: 19940588)
      Arch Intern Med. 2008 Sep 8;168(16):1755-60. (PMID: 18779462)
      Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Feb;17(1):6-10. (PMID: 18245212)
      Acad Med. 2005 Dec;80(12):1094-9. (PMID: 16306279)
      Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1994 Mar;20(3):152-61. (PMID: 8032429)
      Hosp Health Netw. 2008 May;82(5):7 p following 40, 2. (PMID: 18557338)
      Ann Intern Med. 2005 Mar 1;142(5):352-8. (PMID: 15738454)
      Chest. 2008 Jul;134(1):9-12. (PMID: 18628215)
      Hum Factors. 2009 Jun;51(3):339-53. (PMID: 19750796)
      Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Aug;10(8):910-1. (PMID: 12896899)
      Acad Med. 1995 Mar;70(3):224-9. (PMID: 7873011)
      Arch Intern Med. 2007 Oct 22;167(19):2030-6. (PMID: 17954795)
      Ann Clin Res. 1971 Jun;3(3):131-4. (PMID: 4934176)
      Acad Med. 2004 Feb;79(2):186-94. (PMID: 14744724)
      J Hosp Med. 2006 Jul;1(4):257-66. (PMID: 17219508)
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20120112 Date Completed: 20120411 Latest Revision: 20240315
    • الموضوع:
      20240315
    • الرقم المعرف:
      PMC3280171
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1186/1472-6963-12-11
    • الرقم المعرف:
      22233877