Challenges of nurse delivery of psychological interventions for long-term conditions in primary care: a qualitative exploration of the case of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101258411 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1748-5908 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17485908 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Implement Sci Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, 2006-

Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic/*nursing ; Mental Disorders/*nursing ; Primary Health Care/*methods; Delivery of Health Care ; Emotions ; Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic/psychology ; Humans ; Interview, Psychological ; Mental Disorders/psychology ; Mental Disorders/therapy ; Nurse's Role ; Qualitative Research ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Time Factors

Background: The evidence base for a range of psychosocial and behavioural interventions in managing and supporting patients with long-term conditions (LTCs) is now well-established. With increasing numbers of such patients being managed in primary care, and a shortage of specialists in psychology and behavioural management to deliver interventions, therapeutic interventions are increasingly being delivered by general nurses with limited training in psychological interventions. It is unknown what issues this raises for the nurses or their patients. The purpose of the study was to examine the challenges faced by non-specialist nurses when delivering psychological interventions for an LTC (chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis [CFS/ME]) within a primary care setting.
Methods: A qualitative study nested within a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN 74156610] explored the experiences and acceptability of two different psychological interventions (pragmatic rehabilitation and supportive listening) from the perspectives of nurses, their supervisors, and patients. Semi structured in-depth interviews were conducted with three nurse therapists, three supervisors, and 46 patients. An iterative approach was used to develop conceptual categories from the dataset.
Results: Analyses identified four sets of challenges that were common to both interventions: (i) being a novice therapist, (ii) engaging patients in the therapeutic model, (iii) dealing with emotions, and (iv) the complexity of primary care. Each challenge had the potential to cause tension between therapist and patient. A number of strategies were developed by participants to manage the tensions.
Conclusions: Tensions existed for nurses when attempting to deliver psychological interventions for patients with CFS/ME in this primary care trial. Such tensions should be addressed before implementing psychological interventions within routine clinical practice. Similar tensions may be found for other LTCs. Our findings have implications for developing therapeutic alliances and highlight the need for regular supervision.

BMJ. 2005 Aug 20;331(7514):435. (PMID: 16093252)
Nurs Ethics. 2008 May;15(3):371-83. (PMID: 18388171)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD001027. (PMID: 18646067)
Occup Med (Lond). 2005 Jan;55(1):20-31. (PMID: 15699087)
BMJ. 2001 Feb 17;322(7283):387-90. (PMID: 11179154)
BMC Nurs. 2009 Jan 22;8:2. (PMID: 19161604)
N Engl J Med. 1999 Dec 23;341(26):1980-5. (PMID: 10607816)
Am J Med Qual. 2006 Nov-Dec;21(6):375-81. (PMID: 17077419)
Psychol Med. 2003 Feb;33(2):253-61. (PMID: 12622304)
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Jun;18(6):442-9. (PMID: 12823651)
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):63-73. (PMID: 12676418)
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995 Aug;63(4):651-7. (PMID: 7673543)
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Mar;65(3):509-15. (PMID: 19222648)
Evid Based Ment Health. 2010 May;13(2):35-40. (PMID: 21856603)
Health Serv J. 2007 Jul 19;117(6065):suppl 6-8. (PMID: 17844859)
Diabetes Educ. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):795-804. (PMID: 15510531)
Lancet. 2001 Aug 11;358(9280):483-8. (PMID: 11513933)
Br J Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;184:240-6. (PMID: 14990522)
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Jan;51(462):19-24. (PMID: 11271868)
J Adv Nurs. 2001 Jan;33(2):216-24. (PMID: 11168705)
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2001 May-Jun;23(3):138-44. (PMID: 11427246)
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Dec 15;121(12):953-9. (PMID: 7978722)
Health Psychol. 2007 Jan;26(1):1-9. (PMID: 17209691)
Lancet. 1995 Jun 24;345(8965):1616-9. (PMID: 7783541)
Health Psychol. 2007 May;26(3):241-50. (PMID: 17500610)
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Feb;76(1):163-71. (PMID: 18229994)
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83. (PMID: 1593914)
BMJ. 2002 Nov 9;325(7372):1082. (PMID: 12424170)
Pain. 1999 Mar;80(1-2):1-13. (PMID: 10204712)
Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Jan;90(1):4-8. (PMID: 7801947)
J R Soc Med. 2006 Oct;99(10):506-20. (PMID: 17021301)
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Feb-Mar;46(4-5):559-65. (PMID: 9460835)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jul 07;6:86. (PMID: 16827928)
J R Soc Med. 1991 Feb;84(2):118-21. (PMID: 1999813)
Int J Clin Pract. 2002 Jan-Feb;56(1):21-5. (PMID: 11833551)
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2001 Apr;(79):vi-7. (PMID: 19790944)
Br J Health Psychol. 2008 Sep;13(Pt 3):381-400. (PMID: 17535503)
J Psychosom Res. 1993;37(2):147-53. (PMID: 8463991)
BMC Med. 2006 Apr 07;4:9. (PMID: 16603058)
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2011 Apr;12(2):112-22. (PMID: 21457596)

G0200212 United Kingdom MRC_ Medical Research Council; G200212 United Kingdom MRC_ Medical Research Council

Investigator: C Bennett; R Bentall; L Booth; J Brooks; G Cahill; A Chapman; C Chew-Graham; S Connell; C Dowrick; G Dunn; D Fleetwood; L Ibbotson; D Jerman; K Lovell; J Mann; R Morriss; S Peters; P Powell; D Quarmby; G Richardson; L Riste; A Wearden; J Williams

ISRCTN ISRCTN74156610

Date Created: 20111224 Date Completed: 20120419 Latest Revision: 20231104

20231215

PMC3259041

10.1186/1748-5908-6-132

22192566