Walkable new urban LEED_Neighborhood-Development (LEED-ND) community design and children's physical activity: selection, environmental, or catalyst effects?

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101217089 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1479-5868 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14795868 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: [London] : BioMed Central, c2004-

Child Welfare* ; Environment* ; Exercise* ; Residence Characteristics* ; Social Change* ; Urban Population*; Child ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Schools ; Transportation/methods ; Walking

Background: Interest is growing in physical activity-friendly community designs, but few tests exist of communities explicitly designed to be walkable. We test whether students living in a new urbanist community that is also a pilot LEED_ND (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design-Neighborhood Development) community have greater accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) across particular time periods compared to students from other communities. We test various time/place periods to see if the data best conform to one of three explanations for MVPA. Environmental effects suggest that MVPA occurs when individuals are exposed to activity-friendly settings; selection effects suggest that walkable community residents prefer MVPA, which leads to both their choice of a walkable community and their high levels of MVPA; catalyst effects occur when walking to school creates more MVPA, beyond the school commute, on schooldays but not weekends.
Methods: Fifth graders (n = 187) were sampled from two schools representing three communities: (1) a walkable community, Daybreak, designed with new urbanist and LEED-ND pilot design standards; (2) a mixed community (where students lived in a less walkable community but attended the walkable school so that part of the route to school was walkable), and (3) a less walkable community. Selection threats were addressed through controlling for parental preferences for their child to walk to school as well as comparing in-school MVPA for the walkable and mixed groups.
Results: Minutes of MVPA were tested with 3 × 2 (Community by Gender) analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs). Community walkability related to more MVPA during the half hour before and after school and, among boys only, more MVPA after school. Boys were more active than girls, except during the half hour after school. Students from the mixed and walkable communities--who attended the same school--had similar in-school MVPA levels, and community groups did not differ in weekend MVPA, providing little evidence of selection effects.
Conclusions: Even after our controls for selection effects, we find evidence of environmental effects on MVPA. These results suggest that walkable community design, according to new urbanist and LEED_ND pilot design standards, is related to higher MVPA among students at certain times.

Am J Prev Med. 2005 Oct;29(3):179-84. (PMID: 16168866)
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Nov;37(11 Suppl):S582-8. (PMID: 16294121)
J Public Health Policy. 2009;30 Suppl 1:S203-20. (PMID: 19190574)
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Feb 14;8:10. (PMID: 21320322)
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Nov;37(11 Suppl):S523-30. (PMID: 16294115)
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Apr;38(4):787-94. (PMID: 16679998)
Prev Med. 2009 Jun;48(6):519-24. (PMID: 19272404)
Ann Behav Med. 2007 Feb;33(1):29-38. (PMID: 17291168)
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Dec;37(12):2062-9. (PMID: 16331130)
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Jan;30(1):45-51. (PMID: 16414423)
J Phys Act Health. 2006 Feb;3(s1):S118-S128. (PMID: 28834510)
J Phys Act Health. 2006 Feb;3(s1):S55-S76. (PMID: 28834525)
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Feb;161(2):153-8. (PMID: 17283300)
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008 Jan 08;5:1. (PMID: 18182102)
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 May;32(5):963-75. (PMID: 10795788)
BMJ. 2005 Nov 5;331(7524):1061-2. (PMID: 16107430)
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Jun;32(6):509-16. (PMID: 17533067)
JAMA. 2008 Jul 16;300(3):295-305. (PMID: 18632544)
Med Sport Sci. 2007;50:183-199. (PMID: 17387258)
Health Place. 2011 Mar;17(2):545-50. (PMID: 21237697)
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jan;40(1):181-8. (PMID: 18091006)
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008 Jun 23;5:34. (PMID: 18573196)
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Sep;36(9):1637-45. (PMID: 15354049)
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jul;43(7):1360-8. (PMID: 21131873)
Prev Med. 2000 Jan;30(1):70-7. (PMID: 10642462)
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 Nov 03;7:79. (PMID: 21047429)
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Feb;30(2):153-159. (PMID: 16459214)
Health Place. 2009 Sep;15(3):827-40. (PMID: 19285904)
Am J Prev Med. 2003 Nov;25(4):273-6. (PMID: 14580626)
Pediatrics. 2006 Dec;118(6):e1627-34. (PMID: 17142492)
Obes Rev. 2004 May;5 Suppl 1:4-104. (PMID: 15096099)
Am J Health Promot. 2007 Mar-Apr;21(4 Suppl):305-11. (PMID: 17465175)
Am J Public Health. 2009 Mar;99(3):520-6. (PMID: 19106422)
Am J Health Promot. 2008 May-Jun;22(5):350-8. (PMID: 18517096)
J Sch Health. 2009 Jun;79(6):255-61. (PMID: 19432865)

Date Created: 20111222 Date Completed: 20120319 Latest Revision: 20240321

20240321

PMC3267666

10.1186/1479-5868-8-139

22185673