The development of instruments to measure the work disability assessment behaviour of insurance physicians.

Publisher: BioMed Central Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 100968562 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1471-2458 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 14712458 NLM ISO Abbreviation: BMC Public Health Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: London : BioMed Central, [2001-

Attitude of Health Personnel* ; Disability Evaluation* ; Quality of Life* ; Surveys and Questionnaires* ; Work Capacity Evaluation*; Physicians/*psychology ; Psychometrics/*instrumentation; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Humans ; Insurance, Health ; Interviews as Topic ; Job Satisfaction ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands ; Physicians/standards ; Physicians/statistics & numerical data ; Self Efficacy

Background: Variation in assessments is a universal given, and work disability assessments by insurance physicians are no exception. Little is known about the considerations and views of insurance physicians that may partly explain such variation. On the basis of the Attitude--Social norm--self Efficacy (ASE) model, we have developed measurement instruments for assessment behaviour and its determinants.
Methods: Based on theory and interviews with insurance physicians the questionnaire included blocks of items concerning background variables, intentions, attitudes, social norms, self-efficacy, knowledge, barriers and behaviour of the insurance physicians in relation to work disability assessment issues. The responses of 231 insurance physicians were suitable for further analysis. Factor analysis and reliability analysis were used to form scale variables and homogeneity analysis was used to form dimension variables. Thus, we included 169 of the 177 original items.
Results: Factor analysis and reliability analysis yielded 29 scales with sufficient reliability. Homogeneity analysis yielded 19 dimensions. Scales and dimensions fitted with the concepts of the ASE model. We slightly modified the ASE model by dividing behaviour into two blocks: behaviour that reflects the assessment process and behaviour that reflects assessment behaviour.The picture that emerged from the descriptive results was of a group of physicians who were motivated in their job and positive about the Dutch social security system in general. However, only half of them had a positive opinion about the Dutch Work and Income (Capacity for Work) Act (WIA). They also reported serious barriers, the most common of which was work pressure. Finally, 73% of the insurance physicians described the majority of their cases as 'difficult'.
Conclusions: The scales and dimensions developed appear to be valid and offer a promising basis for future research. The results suggest that the underlying ASE model, in modified form, is suitable for describing the assessment behaviour of insurance physicians and the determinants of this behaviour. The next step in this line of research should be to validate the model using structural equation modelling. Finally, the predictive value should be tested in relation to outcome measurements of work disability assessments.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Jun 21;98(12):839-45. (PMID: 16788157)
Disabil Rehabil. 2002 Sep 20;24(14):727-33. (PMID: 12396658)
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Nov;61(11):1144-51. (PMID: 18538994)
BMC Public Health. 2008 Jan 14;8:12. (PMID: 18194525)
Gesundheitswesen. 1993 Dec;55(12):635-40. (PMID: 8111160)
BJU Int. 2005 Apr;95(6):794-8. (PMID: 15794785)
Int J Med Inform. 2007 Dec;76 Suppl 3:S403-16. (PMID: 17569575)
Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr;41(2):374-94. (PMID: 16584454)
J Rehabil Med. 2009 Mar;41(4):267-72. (PMID: 19247547)
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Feb;50(3):407-18. (PMID: 10626764)
Occup Med (Lond). 2006 Oct;56(7):461-8. (PMID: 16782772)
Occup Environ Med. 2003 Jun;60 Suppl 1:i93-8. (PMID: 12782754)
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1977 Feb;27(175):79-82. (PMID: 321769)
Fam Pract. 2006 Apr;23(2):246-52. (PMID: 16461448)
Med Care. 1985 May;23(5):461-83. (PMID: 3925250)
BMC Public Health. 2009 Jul 02;9:216. (PMID: 19573229)
West J Med. 2000 Oct;173(4):244-50. (PMID: 11017984)
Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Jan 30;28(2):111-5. (PMID: 16393841)
BMC Public Health. 2009 Oct 06;9:375. (PMID: 19807905)
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Apr;33(4):447-52. (PMID: 19277977)
Fam Pract. 2001 Aug;18(4):393-8. (PMID: 11477046)
J Health Econ. 2003 May;22(3):403-18. (PMID: 12683959)
Scand J Prim Health Care. 1994 Dec;12(4):281-8. (PMID: 7863147)
Health Psychol. 2003 Jul;22(4):424-8. (PMID: 12940399)
Health Aff (Millwood). 1984 Summer;3(2):74-89. (PMID: 6469198)
Occup Environ Med. 2006 Jul;63(7):495-502. (PMID: 16551761)
Br J Gen Pract. 2000 May;50(454):375-9. (PMID: 10897534)
Am J Med. 2004 Dec 15;117(12):919-24. (PMID: 15629730)
Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(24):1885-90. (PMID: 19037781)
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2002 Jan 5;146(1):27-30. (PMID: 11802334)
Scand J Prim Health Care. 1990 Mar;8(1):45-52. (PMID: 2141431)
Scand J Rheumatol. 2005 Jul-Aug;34(4):277-83. (PMID: 16195160)
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Aug;63(4):899-910. (PMID: 16530904)
Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Sep 16;26(18):1079-86. (PMID: 15371033)
Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;21(4):387-95. (PMID: 15249527)
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2006 Jun;24(2):104-9. (PMID: 16690559)

Date Created: 20110105 Date Completed: 20130213 Latest Revision: 20220316

20231215

PMC3086528

10.1186/1471-2458-11-1

21199570