Characteristics and Representation of Subgrid Convective Flux in a Tropical Cyclone Convection System at Convection‐Permitting Resolution.

A large‐eddy simulation (LES) of an idealized tropical cyclone convection system was conducted as a benchmark to provide the statistical characteristics of subgrid convective flux at convection‐permitting resolution and to evaluate three existing scale‐adaptive convection parameterization schemes in the Weather Research and Forecasting model and a nonlinear horizontal gradient (H‐gradient) term. Coarse‐grained results showed that the vertical profiles of subgrid convective flux presented various modes and each mode exhibited a thin vertical extent, in contrast to the ensemble‐mean profile with a bottom‐heavy, deep structure. A good spatial correspondence between subgrid convective flux and grid‐scale vertical velocity was found in the LES benchmark. The existing convection parameterization schemes were unable to reasonably represent such vertical profiles and the spatial distributions of subgrid convective flux, particularly at high levels. The H‐gradient term was able to represent these characteristics of subgrid convective flux, both in terms of vertical profile and spatial distribution. The limitations of traditional mass‐flux convection parameterization schemes at convection‐permitting resolution and related underlying assumptions are discussed. The physical backgrounds and significances of mass‐flux convection parameterization schemes and the H‐gradient term are clarified. Plain Language Summary: A high‐resolution large‐eddy simulation (LES) of an idealized tropical cyclone convection system was conducted as a reference to characterize the subgrid convective flux at 3 km resolution and to verify current convection parameterization schemes and a nonlinear term based on the horizontal gradients of resolved variables. Subgrid convective fluxes retrieved from the LES benchmark showed shallow vertical thicknesses and a large spatial variability. These characteristics were poorly represented by all considered conventional scale‐aware convection parameterization schemes. The nonlinear term was reasonably able to represent subgrid convective fluxes in terms of their vertical profile and spatial distribution. The physical meanings and backgrounds of conventional convection parameterization scheme and the nonlinear term are discussed. Key Points: At convection‐permitting resolution, vertical profiles of subgrid convective flux exhibit various modes with thin vertical extentsAll considered convection parameterization schemes cannot reasonably represent subgrid convective flux at convection‐permitting resolutionThe H‐gradient term can represent various modes of vertical profiles for subgrid convective flux and spatial distributions [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)