Evaluation of acute postoperative pain management after living donor nephrectomy during the transition from open access to laparoscopic and minimally invasive robotic surgical approach.

المقال يركز على تقييم إدارة الألم بعد الجراحة بعد استئصال الكلى من متبرع حي (LDN) حيث انتقلت تقنيات الجراحة من الوصول المفتوح إلى الأساليب بالمنظار والروبوتية الأقل تدخلاً بين عامي 2019 و2022. أظهرت تحليل رجعي لـ 527 حالة LDN أن الجراحة الروبوتية كانت مرتبطة بأدنى درجات الألم بعد الجراحة واحتياجات المسكنات، بينما أدت الجراحة بالمنظار إلى مستويات أعلى من الألم. كما لاحظت الدراسة تحولًا في استراتيجيات المسكنات من التخدير الإقليمي إلى التخدير الوريدي الذي يتحكم فيه المريض (PCA) والمسكنات البسيطة، مع وجود أغلبية كبيرة من المرضى الذين يحتاجون إلى مسكنات إنقاذ إضافية. تشير النتائج إلى أن النهج الروبوتي الأقل تدخلاً قد يعزز إدارة الألم وتجارب تعافي المتبرعين. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Living donor nephrectomies (LDN) at our institution transitioned from open access to laparoscopic and, more recently, to a minimally invasive robotic surgical approach between 2019 and 2022. Concurrently, postoperative analgesia transitioned from regional anesthesia to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and eventually to simple analgesics with additional rescue analgesic agents, as needed, in accordance with individual physicians' preferences. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the impact of these changes on surgical practice on the analgesic requirements and effectiveness of postoperative pain management. Methods: Electronic records of all LDN cases operated between January 2019 and March 2022 were accessed, and a comparative analysis of patient demographics, surgical approach, duration of surgery, postoperative pain scores, and the analgesics administered within the first 48 h was performed. Results: LDN (n = 527) was performed via laparoscopic (n = 432, 82%), robotic (n = 87, 17%), and open (n = 8, 2%) approaches. All patients were administered regular paracetamol 1 g 6 hourly. IV PCA was used in 85% of cases, predominantly in the laparoscopic (99%) and open (75%) groups (LG and OG, respectively); in contrast, the robotic group (RG) was mostly treated without PCA (81.7%). A variety of analgesic techniques were employed for the remaining patients, including epidural (25% of OG) and rectus sheath/transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block (2% of LG). Additional rescue analgesics were administered to 98% of the patients; 92% of LG needed 1–3 analgesic agents, whereas all of the OG and 37% of RG needed 1–2 rescue analgesics. No correlation was found between patient demographics and surgery duration on pain scores or analgesic requirements. Conclusions: Robotic surgery was associated with the lowest postoperative pain scores and analgesic demand; laparoscopic resection was the most painful of all. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia is the property of Wolters Kluwer India Pvt Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)