Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
![loading](/sites/all/modules/hf_eds/images/loading.gif)
Processing Request
Implementing Multifactorial Risk Assessment with Polygenic Risk Scores for Personalized Breast Cancer Screening in the Population Setting: Challenges and Opportunities.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
![loading](/sites/all/modules/hf_eds/images/loading.gif)
Processing Request
- المؤلفون: Walker, Meghan J.1,2 (AUTHOR) ; Blackmore, Kristina M.1 (AUTHOR); Chang, Amy1 (AUTHOR); Lambert-Côté, Laurence3 (AUTHOR); Turgeon, Annie3 (AUTHOR); Antoniou, Antonis C.4 (AUTHOR); Bell, Kathleen A.1 (AUTHOR); Broeders, Mireille J. M.5 (AUTHOR); Brooks, Jennifer D.2 (AUTHOR); Carver, Tim4 (AUTHOR); Chiquette, Jocelyne3,6 (AUTHOR) ; Després, Philippe7 (AUTHOR); Easton, Douglas F.4 (AUTHOR); Eisen, Andrea1,8 (AUTHOR); Eloy, Laurence9 (AUTHOR); Evans, D. Gareth10 (AUTHOR); Fienberg, Samantha1 (AUTHOR); Joly, Yann11 (AUTHOR); Kim, Raymond H.1,12 (AUTHOR); Kim, Shana J.2 (AUTHOR)
- المصدر:
Cancers. Jun2024, Vol. 16 Issue 11, p2116. 25p.
- الموضوع:
- معلومة اضافية
- الموضوع:
- نبذة مختصرة :
Simple Summary: The current approach to breast cancer screening, which is based on a person's age, overlooks individual-level differences in breast cancer risk. As a result, many people are over- or under-screened according to their actual risk of breast cancer. Risk-stratified breast screening may overcome the limitations of age-based screening, but there are still many knowledge gaps regarding how best to implement it in the population setting. This study will generate the first Canadian evidence on the adoption of breast cancer risk assessment in the population setting, to support the future implementation of risk-stratified breast cancer screening. This study demonstrated that, while risk assessment for risk-stratified screening at the population level is feasible, an equity lens must be considered in implementation to ensure cancer-screening disparities are not widened. Risk-stratified breast screening has been proposed as a strategy to overcome the limitations of age-based screening. A prospective cohort study was undertaken within the PERSPECTIVE I&I project, which will generate the first Canadian evidence on multifactorial breast cancer risk assessment in the population setting to inform the implementation of risk-stratified screening. Recruited females aged 40–69 unaffected by breast cancer, with a previous mammogram, underwent multifactorial breast cancer risk assessment. The adoption of multifactorial risk assessment, the effectiveness of methods for collecting risk factor information and the costs of risk assessment were examined. Associations between participant characteristics and study sites, as well as data collection methods, were assessed using logistic regression; all p-values are two-sided. Of the 4246 participants recruited, 88.4% completed a risk assessment, with 79.8%, 15.7% and 4.4% estimated at average, higher than average and high risk, respectively. The total per-participant cost for risk assessment was CAD 315. Participants who chose to provide risk factor information on paper/telephone (27.2%) vs. online were more likely to be older (p = 0.021), not born in Canada (p = 0.043), visible minorities (p = 0.01) and have a lower attained education (p < 0.0001) and perceived fair/poor health (p < 0.001). The 34.4% of participants requiring risk factor verification for missing/unusual values were more likely to be visible minorities (p = 0.009) and have a lower attained education (p ≤ 0.006). This study demonstrates the feasibility of risk assessment for risk-stratified screening at the population level. Implementation should incorporate an equity lens to ensure cancer-screening disparities are not widened. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
No Comments.