Exploring the typology of reasoning influencing university teachers' language teaching and learning strategies.

Despite the critical role of reasoning in shaping language teaching and learning strategies in higher education, prior studies have either separately examined reasoning or focused on one specific type thereof and language teaching and learning strategies. To address this gap, this study took a comprehensive approach by examining various types of reasoning in language instruction and their alignment with language teaching strategies in higher education. It adopted a sequential mixed-methods design through two phases of data collection. The study instruments included a mixed-method questionnaire, interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis. The quantitative phase collected data from 357 university teachers of Arabic-language disciplines at the university level who completed a mixed-methods questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale and brief written explanation. Exploratory factor analysis, descriptive and inferential analysis of variance and the Scheffé test were used to analyse the quantitative data. In the follow-up qualitative phase, 20 university teachers from the quantitative phase were observed in the classroom and interviewed, and their document tasks were analysed using thematic analysis. The results unveiled four distinct typologies of university teachers' reasoning closely aligned with their language teaching and learning strategies: inductive, abductive, analogical, and deductive reasoning. Notably, these typologies were associated with cognitive, metacognitive, interactional, and Knowledge strategies. Furthermore, the findings highlighted the intricate interplay and mixture of these typologies, indicating that university teachers do not rely solely on one type or strategy. Finally, the conclusion section outlines critical areas for future research concerning reasoning and language teaching and learning strategies in higher education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Asian-Pacific Journal of Second & Foreign Language Education is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)