تعزیر مدنی در سایة جرم تعزیری؛ بازتحلیل انتقادی اثر وضعیِ جرم انتقال مال با انگیزة فرار از پرداخت دین.

Civil Penalties in the Shadow of Criminal Offence: A Critical Reassessment of Fraudulent Alienation.

The concept of fraudulent alienation in Iranian law is complex, particularly concerning criminal and civil law. Although the law acknowledges the term "alienation", legal professionals and judicial precedents have often referred to it as a transaction. Consequently, when analyzing this criminal act, it becomes necessary to delve into the exact meaning of the term and determine whether it encompasses unilateral legal actions. Additionally, the interpretation of "motive" within the realm of criminal law requires further scrutiny. From a civil standpoint, legal practitioners have proposed various possibilities, such as "nullity," "invalidity," and "non-enforceability of the contract towards the creditor," to address the legal consequences of such criminalized transactions. This article critically examines how well each of these conventional legal solutions aligns with the true intentions of the legislator and explores the potential for alternative legal scenarios. Our hypothesis posits the "absolute validity" of fraudulent alienation concerning the parties involved in the transaction and the creditors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Criminal Law & Criminology Studies is the property of University of Tehran and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)