Fiqh Siyasah Qodha'iyyah Review of Judges' in PTUN Decision Number 56/G/SPPU/2018/PTUN-JKT Regarding the Determination of the United Indonesia Justice Party as an Election Participant.

INDONESIA; JAKARTA (Indonesia)

Court decisions are repressive because they exist after the problem has occurred. Related to the background of the problem in this thesis is regarding PTUN's decision. 56/G/SPPU/2018/PTUN-JKT. The Justice and Unity Party of Indonesia sued the General Election Commission of the Republic of Indonesia at the Jakarta State Administrative Court for the issuance of the Decree of the General Election Commission of the Republic of Indonesia Number 58/PL.01.1-Kpt/03/KPU/II/. This was regarding the provisions of the decree stipulating that the Indonesian Justice and Solidarity Party not meet the requirements to take part in the General Election. Based on the problems above, the objectives of this study are: To find out the judge's consideration of the decision Number 56/G/SPPU/2018/PTUN-JKT regarding the Determination of the PKPI Political Party as a Contestant for the 2019 Election. And, to find out the Fiqh siyasah qadhaiyyah regarding the judge's considerations in Decision Number 56/G/SPPU/2018/PTUN-JKT regarding the Determination of PKPI Political Parties as Participants in the 2019 Election. In this study, the library research method was used (Library Research) using various library literature in the form of books, laws, journals, manuscripts, and thesis. The data analysis technique used was qualitative by using the deductive thinking method, with the nature of analytic descriptive method. The results of this study were based on the PTUN judge's decision, which won PKPI for its lawsuit in PTUN court No. 56/G/SPPU/2018/PTUN-JKT. Second, from the point of view of Fiqh siyasa qadhaiyyah, the settlement of election process disputes at the State Administrative Court was included in At-taqodliala darojatain aw al-isti'naf (Appeals). Based on this principle, litigants had obtained a legal decision on a case at the lower-level court, first. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of KnE Social Sciences is the property of Knowledge E DMCC and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)