Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
The Preventive Effect of Urinary Trypsin Inhibitor on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction, on the Aspect of Behavior, Evaluated by Y-Maze Test, via Modulation of Microglial Activity.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- المؤلفون: Cho, Eun-Hwa1 (AUTHOR) ; In, Chi-Bum2,3 (AUTHOR) ; Lee, Gyu-Won2 (AUTHOR) ; Hong, Seung-Wan4 (AUTHOR) ; Seo, Eun-Hye5 (AUTHOR) ; Lee, Won Hyung6,7 (AUTHOR) ; Kim, Seong-Hyop1,4,8,9 (AUTHOR)
- المصدر:
International Journal of Molecular Sciences. Mar2024, Vol. 25 Issue 5, p2708. 12p.
- الموضوع:
- معلومة اضافية
- نبذة مختصرة :
This experimental study was designed to evaluate the effect of ulinastatin, a urinary trypsin inhibitor, on postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in rats under general anesthesia with isoflurane, on the aspect of behavior, as evaluated using a Y-maze test and focusing on microglial activity. Ulinastatin (50,000 U/mL) and normal saline (1 mL) were randomly (1:1) administered intraperitoneally to the ulinastatin and control groups, respectively, before general anesthesia. Anesthesia with isoflurane 1.5 volume% was maintained for 2 h. The Y-maze test was used to evaluate cognitive function. Neuronal damage using caspase-1 expression, the degree of inflammation through cytokine detection, and microglial activation with differentiation of the phenotypic expression were evaluated. Twelve rats were enrolled in the study and evenly allocated into the two groups, with no dropouts from the study. The Y-maze test showed similar results in the two groups before general anesthesia (63 ± 12% in the control group vs. 64 ± 12% in the ulinastatin group, p = 0.81). However, a significant difference was observed between the two groups after general anesthesia (17 ± 24% in the control group vs. 60 ± 12% in the ulinastatin group, p = 0.006). The ulinastatin group showed significantly lower expression of caspase-1. Pro-inflammatory cytokine levels were significantly lower in the ulinastatin group than in the control group. The ulinastatin group had a significantly lower microglial activation (41.74 ± 10.56% in the control group vs. 4.77 ± 0.56% in the ulinastatin, p < 0.001), with a significantly lower activation of M1 phenotypes (52.19 ± 7.83% in the control group vs. 5.58 ± 0.76% in the ulinastatin group, p < 0.001). Administering ulinastatin before general anesthesia prevented neuronal damage and cognitive decline after general anesthesia, in terms of the aspect of behavior, as evaluated by the Y-maze test. The protective effect of ulinastatin was associated with the inhibition of microglial activation, especially the M1 phenotype. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
No Comments.