Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
Cost and utilization analysis of concurrent versus staged testicular prosthesis implantation for radical orchiectomy.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- المؤلفون: Nguyen, Vi; Walia, Arman; Horns, Joshua J.; Paudel, Niraj; Bagrodia, Aditya; Patel, Darshan P.; Hsieh, Tung-Chin; Hotaling, James M.
- المصدر:
PLoS ONE; 1/8/2024, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p1-9, 9p
- الموضوع:
- معلومة اضافية
- الموضوع:
- نبذة مختصرة :
Purpose: American Urological Association guidelines recommend testicular prosthesis discussion prior to orchiectomy. Utilization may be low. We compared outcomes and care utilization between concurrent implant (CI) and staged implant (SI) insertion after radical orchiectomy. Materials & methods: The MarketScan Commercial claims database (2008–2017) was queried for men ages >18 years who underwent radical orchiectomy for testicular mass, stratified as orchiectomy with no implant, CI, or SI. 90-day outcomes included rate of reoperation, readmission, emergency department (ED) presentation, and outpatient visits. Regression models provided rate ratio comparison. Results: 8803 patients (8564 no implant, 190 CI, 49 SI; 2.7% implant rate) were identified with no difference in age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, insurance plan, additional cancer treatment, or metastasis. Median perioperative cost at orchiectomy (+/- implant) for no implant, CI, and SI were $5682 (3648–8554), $7823 (5403–10973), and $5380 (4130–10521), respectively (p<0.001). Median perioperative cost for SI at implantation was $8180 (4920–14591) for a total cost (orchiectomy + implant) of $13650 (5380 + 8180). CI patients were more likely to have follow-up (p = 0.006) with more visits (p = 0.030) compared to the SI group post-implantation but had similar follow-up (p = 0.065) and less visits (p = 0.025) compared to the SI patients' post-orchiectomy period. Overall explant rates were 4.7% for CI and 14.3% for SI (p = 0.04) with a median time to explant of 166 (IQR: 135–210) and 40 days (IQR: 9.5–141.5; p = 0.06). Median cost of removal was $2060 (IQR: 967–2880). Conclusions: CI placement has less total perioperative cost, lower explant rate, and similar postoperative utilization to SI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- نبذة مختصرة :
Copyright of PLoS ONE is the property of Public Library of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.