Perceived Fairness of Human Managers Compared with Artificial Intelligence in Employee Performance Evaluation.

EMPLOYEE reviews; ARTIFICIAL intelligence; JOB performance; FAIRNESS; FIELD research

Human managers are increasingly challenged by artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in performing managerial functions. We undertook a field experiment that used AI vis-à-vis human managers to perform structured, data-intensive evaluations of employee performance. We generate two sets of insights. First, employees considered AI to be both fairer and more accurate in evaluating their performance than the average human manager. Second, to catch up with AI, human managers' fairness perceived by employees played a first-order role by (a) helping human managers, to a greater extent than those managers' evaluation accuracy, to close the performance gap of the employees evaluated by them compared with that of those evaluated by AI, and (b) constraining the effect of human managers' perceived accuracy of evaluations on employees' performance. Thus, facing the competition from AI, it is all the more important for human managers to treat employees fairly and build positive interpersonal relationships with employees. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Management Information Systems is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)