Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Programmed death ligand-1 testing in adenocarcinoma lung: A comparative study of cell block versus biopsy.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • معلومة اضافية
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Background: Immunotherapy currently stands as a novel treatment option, specifically in cases of advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) in tumor cells forms the mainstay for the use of anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of NSCLC. Aims: The objectives of the study were to assess utility of cell blocks for testing of PD-L1 in adenocarcinoma lung and to compare the expression of PD-L1 in cell blocks and the corresponding biopsy specimens. Materials and Methods: The current study was a prospective case series that included 20 cases of NSCLC–adenocarcinoma lung. Cases included in the study had biopsies performed from lung masses, along with which cell blocks were prepared from fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) samples. Testing for PD-L1 was done using the monoclonal PD-L1 antibody, SP-263 clone on the Ventana Benchmark XT system. PD-L1 expression was assessed only in the tumor cells, and cases with >1% expression, cytoplasmic or membranous, in tumor cells were categorized as positive. Results: PD-L1 expression was identified in the biopsy samples of tumor cells of 20% of cases (n = 4/20). In the corresponding cell blocks, PD-L1 expression was identified in the tumor cells of 15% of cases (n = 3/20). Sensitivity and specificity of cell blocks were 75% and 100%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 94.12%, respectively. Conclusion: PD-L1 testing has both predictive and prognostic implications. PD-L1 testing in cell block samples is a potential alternative, specifically in cases where biopsy tissue is minimal or unavailable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Copyright of Journal of Cytology is the property of Wolters Kluwer India Pvt Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)