FIDUCIARIES IN PRIEST'S CLOTHING: CLERGY SEXUAL ABUSE AND FIDUCIARY DUTIES.

This Note argues that clergypersons who offer religious guidance are fiduciaries in some limited circumstances and therefore liable for sexual contact that occurs between them and congregants. This Note will argue that clergypersons are most properly deemed fiduciaries through a fact-based definitional approach. As such, this Note departs from previous arguments that clergypersons are fiduciaries because they provide services analogous to secular counselors. Prospective fiduciary relationships involving clergy should be analyzed using a distinct conceptual account of fiduciary relationships rather than an analogical analysis based on apparent similarities between a clergyperson and other fiduciaries. Such an approach is preferable to the argument by analogy because it can better explain why clergypersons who offer no formal mental health counseling, but only religious guidance, are nevertheless fiduciaries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Northwestern University Law Review is the property of Northwestern University School of Law and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)