Strengthening the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation's Approach to Constructing Alternative Payment Models.

EXPERIMENTAL design; MEDICAL quality control; FEE for service (Medical fees); HEALTH services accessibility; RESEARCH methodology; MATHEMATICAL models; HEALTH facility administration; PUBLIC health; MEDICAL care costs; PATIENT-centered care; CENTERS for Medicare & Medicaid Services (U.S.); HEALTH insurance reimbursement; ORGANIZATIONAL goals; CONCEPTUAL structures; CONFLICT management; NATIONAL health services; HEALTH care reform; THEORY; RESEARCH bias; FINANCIAL management; DIFFUSION of innovations

The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) seeks to develop evidence‐based alternative payment models (APM) to improve health care quality and reduce costs, but its performance in achieving these goals has been mixed. In October 2021, CMMI released its Innovation Strategy Refresh to highlight challenges faced by payment models and suggest new strategic approaches for the upcoming decade. While a welcome recast of organizational goals, the Refresh leaves space for how CMMI will address persistent issues. These include how CMMI can best engage physicians and patients in APMs, minimize conflicting incentives among APMs, reduce selection bias in model participation, and, ultimately, transition away from the fee‐for‐service framework that underlies much of Medicare reimbursement. This article provides guidance to CMMI's vision by examining challenges within CMMI's strategy for model building and offering solutions to mitigate these issues. These strategies include engaging beneficiaries in APM incentives, expanding operational flexibility to improve clinical behaviors (e.g., waivers), rectifying issues with conflicting model incentives, building voluntary short‐term and mandatory long‐term incentives to mitigate selection bias, and transitioning to an overriding population‐based model to constrain net costs. Policy PointsThe Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) seeks to develop evidence‐based alternative payment models (APM) to improve care quality and reduce health care cost, but its performance in achieving these goals has been mixed.In October 2021, CMMI released a "strategic refresh" of its goals but left space for how persistent issues to model development would be addressed.We propose strategies to engage physicians and patients in APMs, minimize conflicting incentives among APMs, reduce selection bias in model participation, and, ultimately, transition away from the fee‐for‐service framework that underlies much of Medicare reimbursement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Milbank Quarterly is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)