Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Anniversary Narratives of the Health Care State: Institutional Entrenchment in Retrospect.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • المؤلفون: Hughes Tuohy, Carolyn
  • المصدر:
    Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law. Apr2023, Vol. 48 Issue 2, p269-298. 30p. 1 Chart.
  • معلومة اضافية
    • الموضوع:
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Institutional narratives, appealing both to the intellect and the imagination. are powerful mechanisms of entrenchment. Drawing on close examination of legislative debates, interview transcripts, and official documents, this article analyzes institutional narratives of the British National Health Service (NHS) and American Medicare and Medicaid. These narratives take the form of epics, featuring founding heroes, adversaries, stewards. saviors. and other characters, and are retold on multiple occasions, and especially on anniversaries of the founding date. In the process, certain elements of history are remembered, and others; forgotten. The myth of the NHS as a single national institution obscured much of the complexity and compromise that went into its founding and subsequent development. but preserved fidelity to its founding principles. In the United States, the dominant narrative belonged to Medicare, while Medicaid featured as an afterthought. in the case of the NHS, narrative entrenchment served to preserve universal access to comprehensive health care. In the case of American Medicare. entrenchment preserved the original mission of the institution but kept it from expanding to a broader swath of the population, even as its less-entrenched companion Medicaid provided a vehicle for coverage of an increasingly wide range of population groups. A distinct Medicaid narrative developed only after incremental expansion was well underway. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Copyright of Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law is the property of Duke University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)