COLLECTIVE MEMORY, CRIMINAL LAW, AND THE TRIAL OF DEREK CHAUVIN.

This Note describes how criminal trials for prominent criminal acts contribute to the collective memory of the underlying offense. Hannah Arendt once argued that the purpose of criminal trials is to "render justice, and nothing else." Unlike criminal trials, political trials strive to produce collective memory. This Note utilizes political trials as a foil to criminal trials to identify the ways that criminal trials succeed (and fail) to produce collective memory. Several features of the criminal trial--namely, the trial's unique narrative form, constituent storytellers, capacity to capture the gravity of the offense, and jury--add to society's shared narrative of the offense. By developing and utilizing a framework for how criminal trials manufacture collective memory, this Note considers how the trial of Derek Chauvin adds to the collective memory of George Floyd's murder. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Duke Law Journal is the property of Duke University, School of Law and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)