Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fff43/fff435a6673b4ccb0fb2b6c004bd7685e10aa816" alt="loading"
Processing Request
Conflict over fertilization underlies the transient evolution of reinforcement.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fff43/fff435a6673b4ccb0fb2b6c004bd7685e10aa816" alt="loading"
Processing Request
- معلومة اضافية
- نبذة مختصرة :
When two species meet in secondary contact, the production of low fitness hybrids may be prevented by the adaptive evolution of increased prezygotic isolation, a process known as reinforcement. Theoretical challenges to the evolution of reinforcement are generally cast as a coordination problem, i.e., "how can statistical associations between traits and preferences be maintained in the face of recombination?" However, the evolution of reinforcement also poses a potential conflict between mates. For example, the opportunity costs to hybridization may differ between the sexes or species. This is particularly likely for reinforcement based on postmating prezygotic (PMPZ) incompatibilities, as the ability to fertilize both conspecific and heterospecific eggs is beneficial to male gametes, but heterospecific mating may incur a cost for female gametes. We develop a population genetic model of interspecific conflict over reinforcement inspired by "gametophytic factors", which act as PMPZ barriers among Zea mays subspecies. We demonstrate that this conflict results in the transient evolution of reinforcement—after females adaptively evolve to reject gametes lacking a signal common in conspecific gametes, this gamete signal adaptively introgresses into the other population. Ultimately, the male gamete signal fixes in both species, and isolation returns to pre-reinforcement levels. We interpret geographic patterns of isolation among Z. mays subspecies considering these findings and suggest when and how this conflict can be resolved. Our results suggest that sexual conflict over fertilization may pose an understudied obstacle to the evolution of reinforcement. Selection can favor the prevention of hybridization by a process known as reinforcement. Inspired by the biology of hybridizing corn subspecies, this study presents a model showing that differences in the costs of hybridization to each sex can undermine this process; this sexual conflict over hybridization results in the transient evolution of reinforcement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- نبذة مختصرة :
Copyright of PLoS Biology is the property of Public Library of Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
No Comments.