Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Misrepresentations about palliative options and prognosis in motor neurone disease: some legal considerations.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • المؤلفون: Foster C;Foster C
  • المصدر:
    Journal of evaluation in clinical practice [J Eval Clin Pract] 2005 Feb; Vol. 11 (1), pp. 21-5.
  • نوع النشر :
    Journal Article
  • اللغة:
    English
  • معلومة اضافية
    • المصدر:
      Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9609066 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 1356-1294 (Print) Linking ISSN: 13561294 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Eval Clin Pract Subsets: MEDLINE
    • بيانات النشر:
      Original Publication: Oxford, England : Wiley-Blackwell, c1995-
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      If euthanasia were legalized, clinicians would be under a duty to explain to patients requesting euthanasia what the prognosis and palliative options were. Anecdotal evidence suggests that some patients suffering from motor neurone disease may request euthanasia because of a fear of choking to death. The literature indicates that with competent palliative care this is unlikely to occur. It is assumed, for the purposes of argument, that responsible clinicians would accordingly reassure patients that such a fear was unwarranted, and that such a reassurance would cause patients for whom choking was the main concern either to withdraw a request for euthanasia or not to make it in the first place. The legal consequences of both negligent and deliberate failure to represent the true prognostic and palliative situation are discussed. In the case of a deliberate failure, with the intention to induce the patient to consent to euthanasia, it is suggested that a verdict of murder would be ethically right. It is argued that such a failure is best regarded as an omission. The English law currently does not countenance the possibility of murder by omission. It is suggested that the distinction between acts and omissions, while sometimes convenient, can sometimes produce injustice, and that the distinction should not be allowed to prevent conviction for murder where this is clearly appropriate.
    • الموضوع:
      Date Created: 20050122 Date Completed: 20050518 Latest Revision: 20050121
    • الموضوع:
      20250114
    • الرقم المعرف:
      10.1111/j.1365-2753.2004.00487.x
    • الرقم المعرف:
      15660533