Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading  Processing Request

Comparison of Assessment Methods for Muscular Power in Physical Education.

Item request has been placed! ×
Item request cannot be made. ×
loading   Processing Request
  • المؤلفون: Sibley, Benjamin
  • المصدر:
    Physical Educator. 1/1/2020, Vol. 77 Issue 1, p1-14. 14p.
  • معلومة اضافية
    • الموضوع:
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      In the process of educating physically literate individuals, physical educators are tasked with assessing health-related fitness of their students. It is essential to identify or develop appropriate field tests of muscular power for use in physical education settings. This study assessed jumping power in a sample of fourth, sixth, and eighth graders via a novel calculation method and compared different field tests and calculations for assessing muscular power. Participants (n = 99), aged 9 to 14 years, were recruited from fourth-, sixth-, and eighth-grade physical education classes in one K-8 school. Three jump measurements were taken within the context of a physical education class: vertical jump (VJ) via a Vertec device, countermovement jump (CMJ) based on flight time via MyJump iOS app, and standing long jump. Vertical jump scores assessed via the Vertec device were significantly greater than those for the CMJ. The mean power for participants in this study was 873 W for a CMJ and 1544 W for a VJ. Standing long jump only had a moderate correlation with power calculated from a CMJ (r = .41). Results confirmed that calculations of power that factor in VJ and body weight provide a better indication of power than does jump performance alone. The equation used to calculate jumping power offers a novel approach for physical education that is accurate and feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
    • نبذة مختصرة :
      Copyright of Physical Educator is the property of Sagamore Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)