Low Back Pain Treatment by Athletic Trainers and Athletic Therapists: Biomedical or Biopsychosocial Orientation?

SCALE analysis (Psychology); STATISTICS; T-test (Statistics); PAIN management; DATA analysis; PHYSICAL training & conditioning; TREATMENT effectiveness; CROSS-sectional method; DATA analysis software; DESCRIPTIVE statistics; ONE-way analysis of variance; LUMBAR pain

CANADA; UNITED States

Context: Low back pain (LBP) remains a societal burden due to consistently high rates of recurrence and chronicity. Recent evidence suggested that a provider's treatment orientation influences patient beliefs, the clinical approach, and subsequently, rehabilitation outcomes. Objective: To characterize American athletic trainer (AT) and Canadian athletic therapist (C-AT) treatment orientations toward LBP. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Online survey. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 273 ATs (response rate = 13.3%) and 382 C-ATs (response rate = 15.3%). Main Outcome Measure(s): Participants completed demographic questions and the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS) for ATs/C-ATs. The PABS measures the biomedical and biopsychosocial treatment orientation of health care providers and is scored on a 6-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics characterized the participants; t tests and 1-way analyses of variance identified differences between group means; and Spearman correlations assessed relationships between the biomedical and biopsychosocial scores and age, number of LBP patients per year, and years of experience. Results: Athletic trainers treating 9 to 15 LBP patients per year had higher biomedical scores (35.0 6 5.7) than ATs treating 16 to 34 (31.9 6 5.5, P =.039) or .34 (31.7 6 8.6, P = .018) LBP patients per year. The C-ATs treating 16 to 34 (31.8 6 6.3, P = .038) and .34 (31.0 6 6.7, P < .001) LBP patients per year had lower biomedical scores than those treating <-8 LBP patients per year (34.8 6 5.9). The C-ATs with <-5 years of experience had higher biomedical scores than those with 10 to 15 (31.0 6 6.7, P = .011) and 16 to 24 (29.8 6 7.5, P < .001) years of experience. Canadian athletic therapists treating the general public had higher (31.7 6 4.0) biopsychosocial scores than ATs treating athletes (31.3 6 3.5, P = .006). The C-ATs <-35.6 years of age had higher biomedical scores (33.1 6 5.9) than those .35.6 years of age (30.5 6 7.0, P < .001). Conclusions: Athletic trainers and C-ATs who treated more LBP patients per year were more likely to score low on a biomedical treatment orientation subscale. Because this orientation has predicted poor outcomes in other health care providers, further research is needed to determine the effects of ATs' and C-ATs' biomedical orientations on rehabilitation outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Athletic Training (Allen Press) is the property of KnowledgeWorks Global, Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)