Twelve tips for the construction of ethical dilemma case-based assessment.

MEDICAL ethics; CRITICAL thinking; EDUCATIONAL tests & measurements; MEDICAL education; DECISION making in clinical medicine; PROFESSIONAL education; COGNITION; CURRICULUM planning; CASE studies; RATING of students

Ethical dilemma case-based examination (ethics Script Concordance Test, eSCT) is a written examination that can be delivered to a large group of examinees for the purpose of measuring high-level thinking. As it accommodates for diverse responses from experts, ethics SCT allows partial credits. The framework of ethics SCT includes a vignette with an ethical dilemma and a leading question, which asks the examinee to “agree” or “disagree”, plus the shifts of prior decision by adding new information. In this article, the following tips for constructing this type of examination are provided: use “true” dilemmas, select an appropriate ethical issue, target high-level cognitive tasks, list key components, keep a single central theme, device quality scoring system, be important and plausible, be clear, select quality experts, validate, know the limitation, and be familiar with test materials. The use of eSCT to measure ethical reasoning ability appears to be both viable and desirable. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)