Checklist to meet Ethical and Legal Obligations in the consent pathway for critically ill patients (ChELO): A quality improvement project and case studies.

Ethical or legal errors related to the consent pathway for incapable patients are an everyday reality. Quality improvements in communication or palliative care have been attempted, but little attention has been given to meeting basic legal and ethical obligations. In this paper, the authors share lessons learned during two years of implementing the Checklist for meeting Ethical and Legal Obligations (ChELO) in the intensive care unit of a large community hospital in Ontario. We use a case-based approach to demonstrate the need for our intervention, our use of positive deviance in a change strategy, and the effectiveness of the checklist itself. Through stories, we show common ethical and legal errors related to the consent pathway and how we were able to resolve them with this innovative tool. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Critical Care Nursing is the property of Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)