Principles and Manifestations of Government Intervention in the Realm of Organized Moral Crimes ; مبانی و جلوه‌های مداخله دولت در قلمرو جرائم اخلاقی سازمان‌یافته

Background and Aim: Moral crimes are considered the most important example of social security, which is related to the ability to maintain moral patterns, culture, religion, national custom identity with acceptable conditions of change. Therefore, government intervention in the field of organized moral crimes has been considered in recent decades and criminalization in the field of personal moral corruption and moral crimes without victimization is doomed. Methods: This research is theoretical, the research method is descriptive-analytical, and the collection of information was done in a library and by referring to documents. Ethical Considerations: In all stages of writing the present study, while respecting the originality of the texts, honesty and trustworthiness have been observed. Results: Findings indicate that the purpose of organized moral crimes is mainly to gain material power, illegitimate and immoral services and finally material objects. Considering the acceptance of government intervention in providing moral security related to group or organized corruption and delegating the provision of individual or personal moral security to the people and civil institutions; It is necessary to distinguish the manifestations of organized moral crimes from individual moral crimes. Conclusion: Given that the values, norms and achievements of the age of modernity, which rely on empiricism, reason and science, do not meet human needs alone, therefore, one of the implications of moral security is that the intellectuals and elites of society accept that if the traditions, religious, cultural and national values of society play a role in preventing and moderating the deviations and excesses of science, knowledge and experience, and their duty is to try to preserve and strengthen them instead of confronting them. In a religious government, no executive, legislative or judicial authority can ignore or deny its responsibility to combat the manifestations of organized and group corruption. Please cite this article as: ...