نبذة مختصرة : Background: Medical education research (MER) seeks to contribute to the scientific knowledge in this area and to the further development of educational practice. However, the lack of relevance of the studies conducted in this field has been criticized for years. The present work therefore aims to clarify the tasks and objectives of MER and the nature of research in this area. To this end, the subjects, objectives, and types of research that are common to MER are analyzed and categories for these are developed. Method: The categories for research subjects and research objectives were developed iteratively in three phases with multiple rounds based on samples of peer-reviewed articles. Depending on the round, two to six people were involved in the independent categorization, finding mutual consent, and further development of the categories. At the same time, research types were defined for MER. Results: 169 articles were assessed. Eleven subject categories and eight categories of research objectives were identified, and four types of research were defined as relevant.Discussion: The categories found for research subjects partly coincide with existing category systems but also broaden them. The research objectives identified are more specific than they have been before, which limits the scope for interpretation. Conclusion: The category systems developed can help to define the subjects and objectives of medical education research more precisely and to differentiate between the research types and their significance. In addition, trends and temporary phenomena can also be depicted using the categories found. ; Hintergrund: Medizinische Ausbildungsforschung (MAF) soll einen Beitrag zum Erkenntnisgewinn sowie zur Weiterentwicklung der Ausbildungspraxis leisten. Seit Jahren wird jedoch die mangelnde Relevanz der in diesem Bereich durchgeführten Studien kritisiert. In der vorliegenden Arbeit sollen daher die Aufgaben und Ziele der MAF sowie die Art und Weise der Forschung in diesem Bereich geklärt werden. Hierzu werden ...
Relation: McKeachie WJ. Research on College Teaching: The Historical Background. J Educ Psychol. 1990;82(2):189-200. DOI:10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.189; Norman G. Fifty years of medical education research: waves of migration. Med Educ. 2011;45(8):785-791. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03921.x; Schmidt HH, Mamede S. How cognitive psychology changed the face of medical education research. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020;25(5):1025-1043. DOI:10.1007/s10459-020-10011-0; Kuper A, Albert M, Hodges BD. The origins of the field of medical education research. Acad Med. 2010;85(8):1347-1353. DOI:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181dce9a7; Swanwick T, Forrest K, O’Brien BC, editors. Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory, and Practice, 3rd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley Blackwell; 2018. DOI:10.1002/9781119373780; Dent J, Harden R, Hunt D, editors. A practical guide for medical teachers. 6th ed. London, UK: Elsevier; 2021.; Norman GR, Vleuten CP, Newble DI, Dolmans DH, Mann KV, Rothman A, Curry L, editors. International Handbook of Research in Medical Education. Dordrecht: Springer; 2012.; Fabry G. Medizindidaktik. Für eine kompetenzorientierte, praxisrelevante und wissenschaftlich fundierte Ausbildung. 2. vollst. überarb. Aufl. Bern: Hogrefe; 2023. DOI:10.1024/85852-000; Raes P, Bauer D, Schöppe F, Fischer MR. The active participation of German-speaking countries in conferences of the Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) between 2005 and 2013: A reflection of the development of medical education research? GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2014;31(3):Doc28. DOI:10.3205/zma000920; Rotgans JI. The themes, institutions, and people of medical education research 1988-2010. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012;17(4):515-527. DOI:10.1007/s10459-011-9328-x; Spiel C, Wagner P, Götz T, Lüftenegger M, Schober B. Bildungspsychologie: Konzeption, Strukturmodell, Stellenwert und Perspektiven. In: Spiel C, Götz T, Wagner P, Lüftenegger M, Schober B, editors. Bildungspsychologie – ein Lehrbuch. 2. vollst. überarb. Aufl. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2022. p.11-30. DOI:10.1026/03108-000; Cook DA, Bordage G, Schmidt HG. Description, justification and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Med Educ. 2008;42(2):128-133. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02974.x; Ringsted C, Hodges B, Scherpbier A. 'The research compass': an introduction to research in medical education: AMEE Guide no. 56. Med Teach. 2011;33(9):695-709. DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2011.595436; Albert M. Understanding the debate on medical education research: a sociological perspective. Acad Med. 2004;79(10): 948-954. DOI:10.1097/00001888-200410000-00009; Eva K. Broadening the debate about quality in medical education research. Med Educ. 2009;43(4):294-296. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03342.x; Eva K. Publishing during COVID-19: Lessons for health education research. Med Educ. 2021;55(3):278-280. DOI:10.1111/medu.14450; Albert M, Hodges B, Regehr G. Research in medical education: balancing service and science. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007;12(1):103-115. DOI:10.1007/s10459-006-9026-2; Regehr G. It's NOT rocket science: rethinking our metaphors for research in health professions education. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):31-39. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03418.x; Whitcomb ME. Research in medical education: what do we know about the link between what doctors are taught and what they do? Acad Med. 2002;77(11):1067-1068. DOI:10.1097/00001888-200211000-00001; Gruppen LD. Improving medical education research. Teach Learn Med. 2007l;19(4):331-335. DOI:10.1080/10401330701542370; Leif M, Semarad N, Ganesan V, Selting K, Burr J, Svec A, Clements P, Talmon G. The Quality Of Evidence In Preclinical Medical Education Literature: A Systematic Review. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019;10:925-933. DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S212858; Colliver JA, McGaghie WC. The reputation of medical education research: quasi-experimentation and unresolved threats to validity. Teach Learn Med. 2008;20(2):101-103. DOI:10.1080/10401330801989497; Stokes DE. Pasteur’s Quadrant. Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press; 1997.; Jovanović M. Fußspuren in der Publikationslandschaft: Einordnung wissenschaftlicher Themen und Technologien in grundlagen- und anwendungsorientierte Forschung mithilfe bibliometrischer Methoden. Stuttgart: Frauenhofer-Verlag; 2011.; Hoffmann N. Dokumentenanalyse in der Bildungs- und Sozialforschung. Überblick und Einführung. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa; 2017.; Flick U. Qualitative Forschung. Theorie, Methoden, Anwendung in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften. 5. Aufl. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt; 2000.; Wirtz M, Caspar F. Beurteilerübereinstimmung und Beurteilerreliabilität. Methoden zur Bestimmung und Verbesserung der Zuverlässigkeit von Einschätzungen mittels Kategoriensystemen und Ratingskalen. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2002.; Landis RJ, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-174.; Brüggemann A, Bromme R. Anwendungsorientierte Grundlagenforschung in der Psychologie: Sicherung von Qualität und Chancen in den Beurteilungs- und Entscheidungsprozessen der DFG. Psycholog Rundschau. 2006;57(2):112-118.; Döring N, Bortz J. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften. 5. vollst. überarb. aktual. und erweit. Aufl. Berlin: Springer; 2016. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-41089-5; Reinders H, Gräsel C, Ditton H. Praxisbezug Empirischer Bildungsforschung. In: Reinders H, Ditton H, Gräsel C, Gniewosz B, editors. Empirische Bildungsforschung. Gegenstandsbereiche. Wiesbaden: VS Verl. für Sozialwiss. 2011. p.221-233. DOI:10.1007/978-3-531-93021-3_19; Fischer F, Waibel M, Wecker C. Nutzenorientierte Grundlagenforschung im Bildungsbereich. Zeitschr Erzwiss. 2005;8(3):427-442.; Bush V. Science: The Endless Frontier; A report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research. Reprint anlässlich des 75. Jahrestages. National Science Foundation; 2020. Zugänglich unter/available from: https://www.nsf.gov/about/history/EndlessFrontier_w.pdf; Ellaway RH, Hecker KG. What role does basic research have in an applied field? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022;27(2):289-292. DOI:10.1007/s10459-022-10117-7; Tolsgaard MG. Medical education research in obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obst Gyn. 2019;220(1):121. DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.013; Meyer HS, Durning SJ, Sklar DP, Maggio LA. Making the first cut: an analysis of academic medicine editors’ reasons for not sending manuscripts out for external peer review. Acad Med. 2018;93(3):464-470. DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001860; Prystowsky JB, Bordage G. An outcomes research perspective on medical education: the predominance of trainee assessment and satisfaction. Med Educ. 2001;35(4):331-336. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00910.x; Biesta GJJ, van Braak M. Beyond the medical model: Thinking differently about medical education and medical education research. Teach Learn Med. 2020;32(4):449-456. DOI:10.1080/10401334.2020.1798240; Norman G. Editorial - how bad is medical education research anyway? Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007;12(1):1-5. DOI:10.1007/s10459-006-9047-x; Lurie SJ. Raising the passing grade for studies of medical education. JAMA. 2003;290(9):1210-1212. DOI:10.1001/jama.290.9.1210; Bolander Laksov K, Dornan T, Teunissen PW. Making theory explicit - An analysis of how medical education research(ers) describe how they connect to theory. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):18. DOI:10.1186/s12909-016-0848-1; Nichols TR, Wisner, PM, Cripe G, Gulabchand L. Putting the Kappa Statistic to Use. Qual Assur J. 2010;13:57-61. DOI:10.1002/qaj.481; Souvignier E, Gold A. Wirksamkeit von Lehrmethoden. In: Schweizer K, editor. Leistung und Leistungsdiagnostik. Berlin: Springer; 2006. p.146-166. DOI:10.1007/3-540-33020-8_10; Tenorth HE, Tippelt R, editors. Lexikon Pädagogik. Weinheim: Beltz; 2007. p.137f.; Döring N. Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften. 6. Aufl. Berlin: Springer; 2023. DOI:10.1007/978-3-662-64762-2; https://series.publisso.de/en/journals/jme/volume43/zma001806; https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001806; https://series.publisso.de/en/publisso_gold/export/pdf/article/5500/zma001806.pdf
Processing Request
No Comments.