Using machine learning to explore the efficacy of administrative variables in prediction of subjective-wellbeing outcomes in New Zealand.

Publisher: Nature Publishing Group Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101563288 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2045-2322 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 20452322 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Sci Rep Subsets: MEDLINE

Original Publication: London : Nature Publishing Group, copyright 2011-

Machine Learning* ; Personal Satisfaction* ; Mental Health*; New Zealand ; Humans ; Quality of Life ; Female ; Male ; Adult ; Middle Aged

The growing acknowledgment of population wellbeing as a key indicator of societal prosperity has propelled governments worldwide to devise policies aimed at improving their citizens' overall wellbeing. In New Zealand, the General Social Survey provides wellbeing metrics for a representative subset of the population (~ 10,000 individuals). However, this sample size only provides a surface-level understanding of the country's wellbeing landscape, limiting our ability to comprehensively assess the impacts of governmental policies, particularly on smaller subgroups who may be of high policy interest. To overcome this challenge, comprehensive population-level wellbeing data is imperative. Leveraging New Zealand's Integrated Data Infrastructure, this study developed and validated the efficacy of three predictive models-Stepwise Linear Regression, Elastic Net Regression, and Random Forest-for predicting subjective wellbeing outcomes (life satisfaction, life worthwhileness, family wellbeing, and mental wellbeing) using census-level administrative variables as predictors. Our results demonstrated the Random Forest model's effectiveness in predicting subjective wellbeing, reflected in low RMSE values (~ 1.5). Nonetheless, the models exhibited low R² values, suggesting limited explanatory capacity for the nuanced variability in outcome variables. While achieving reasonable predictive accuracy, our findings underscore the necessity for further model refinements to enhance the prediction of subjective wellbeing outcomes.
(© 2025. The Author(s).)

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Environ Int. 2016 Nov;96:48-57. (PMID: 27599349)
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:207-28. (PMID: 24387090)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jun 11;121(24):e2322973121. (PMID: 38833466)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 12;116(11):5188-5193. (PMID: 30804178)
Prev Med. 2021 Apr;145:106416. (PMID: 33524416)
Int J Health Geogr. 2021 Apr 6;20(1):16. (PMID: 33823853)
Ecology. 2007 Nov;88(11):2783-92. (PMID: 18051647)
J Urban Health. 2003 Dec;80(4):536-55. (PMID: 14709704)
PLoS One. 2015 May 04;10(5):e0125602. (PMID: 25938675)
Health Place. 2016 May;39:70-8. (PMID: 26974233)
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun 1;48(3):1027. (PMID: 30879058)
Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167-76. (PMID: 25831962)
Soc Indic Res. 2013 Feb;110(3):837-861. (PMID: 23329863)
Public Health. 2013 Nov;127(11):1005-11. (PMID: 24262442)
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 14;117(15):8398-8403. (PMID: 32229555)

Keywords: Administrative data; Census; Machine learning; Predictive models; Subjective wellbeing

Date Created: 20250225 Date Completed: 20250510 Latest Revision: 20250510

20260130

PMC11861262

10.1038/s41598-025-90852-0

40000735