Professor leitor, do imagin?rio ao real: implica??es do pr?-letramento na forma??o docente

Submitted by Ricardo Cedraz Duque Moliterno (ricardo.moliterno@uefs.br) on 2017-02-13T23:45:04Z No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTACAO.ROSANA_FALC?O. 2016.pdf: 1538531 bytes, checksum: 98cf5a7d0ee382bf0e7527de39404c64 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2017-02-13T23:45:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTACAO.ROSANA_FALC?O. 2016.pdf: 1538531 bytes, checksum: 98cf5a7d0ee382bf0e7527de39404c64 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-07-27
Experience experienced reader, coupled with the realization that the teacher is the main readers students forming agent prompted me to investigate their training reader, teacher person, in view of this present literature as a way of dealing with the world, favoring the incorporation of reading the personal and professional life, with a view to building a qualified educational practice. In this perspective, the reflections made in this research aim to understand the implications of the Continuing Education Program Pro-Literacy in reader teacher constitution process. Thus, the theoretical and methodological support was gaining meaning from the principles of qualitative approach, electing as devices for collecting "data" the narrative interview with four teachers of the Municipal Feira de Santana Education who took the course in 2008 and the consultation of the documents that support the work of Pro-Literacy. In the development of this production, it established a theoretical / empirical dialogue of the training paths of interviewees with theorists who deal with teacher training, namely: N?voa (1992; 2009); Gatti (2006; 2010); Freire (1995), among others, as well as scholars of the language area, specifically in reading, such as: Zilberman (1991/1992/1988); Lajolo (1988; 2004); Bakhtin (1986; 2005; 2006); Geraldi (2004); Travaglia (1996); Younes (2012); Chartier (1994), among others. This research shows that the main focus of the Pro-Literacy Course is the formation of the student reader and do not constitute in therefore causing concern and discussion of this course the reader teacher training. What odds with its theoretical proposal, proposing a conception of continuing education supported teachers in reflection, autonomy, training of professional identity and discussion. Aware of the limitations of continuing education policies in this language search area indicates the need to invest in a training process that has as its core teaching reader training, as the teachers interviewed claim.
A experi?ncia leitora vivenciada, aliada a compreens?o de que o professor ? o principal agente de forma??o de alunos leitores me instigou a investigar a sua forma??o leitora, da pessoa do professor, na perspectiva de que esta apresente a literatura como uma forma de lidar com o mundo, favorecendo a incorpora??o da leitura ? vida pessoal e profissional, tendo em vista a constru??o de uma pr?tica educativa qualificada. Nessa perspectiva, as reflex?es tecidas nesta investiga??o t?m como objetivo compreender quais as implica??es do Programa de Forma??o Continuada Pr?-Letramento no processo de constitui??o do professor leitor. Assim, a sustenta??o te?rico-metodol?gica foi ganhando sentido a partir dos princ?pios da abordagem qualitativa, elegendo como dispositivos de recolha de ?dados? a entrevista narrativa com quatro professoras da Rede Municipal de Ensino de Feira de Santana que fizeram o curso no ano de 2008, bem como a consulta aos documentos que subsidiam o trabalho do Pr?-Letramento. No desenvolvimento dessa produ??o, foi estabelecido um di?logo te?rico/emp?rico dos percursos formativos dos sujeitos entrevistados com te?ricos que versam sobre forma??o docente, a saber: N?voa (1992;2009); Gatti (2006;2010); Freire (1995), dentre outros, bem como estudiosos da ?rea de linguagem, mais especificamente em leitura, tais como: Zilberman (1991/1992/1988); Lajolo (1988;2004); Bakhtin (1986;2005;2006); Geraldi (2004); Travaglia (1996); Yunes (2012); Chartier (1994), dentre outros. A presente investiga??o revela que o foco principal do Curso Pr?-Letramento ? a forma??o do aluno leitor, n?o se constituindo portanto em alvo de preocupa??o e discuss?o deste curso a forma??o leitora do professor. O que destoa da sua proposta te?rica, ao propor uma concep??o de forma??o continuada de professores amparada na reflex?o, na autonomia, na forma??o da identidade profissional e na discuss?o. Cientes das limita??es das pol?ticas de forma??o continuada na ?rea de linguagem esta pesquisa indica para a necessidade de investir em um processo formativo que tenha como cerne a forma??o leitora docente, conforme clamam os professores entrevistados.