Diagnosis and prognosis of abnormal cardiac scintigraphy uptake suggestive of cardiac amyloidosis using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, international, multicentre, cross-tracer development and validation study

Background: The diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis can be established non-invasively by scintigraphy using bone-avid tracers, but visual assessment is subjective and can lead to misdiagnosis. We aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI) system for standardised and reliable screening of cardiac amyloidosis-suggestive uptake and assess its prognostic value, using a multinational database of 99mTc-scintigraphy data across multiple tracers and scanners. Methods: In this retrospective, international, multicentre, cross-tracer development and validation study, 16 241 patients with 19 401 scans were included from nine centres: one hospital in Austria (consecutive recruitment Jan 4, 2010, to Aug 19, 2020), five hospital sites in London, UK (consecutive recruitment Oct 1, 2014, to Sept 29, 2022), two centres in China (selected scans from Jan 1, 2021, to Oct 31, 2022), and one centre in Italy (selected scans from Jan 1, 2011, to May 23, 2023). The dataset included all patients referred to whole-body 99mTc-scintigraphy with an anterior view and all 99mTc-labelled tracers currently used to identify cardiac amyloidosis-suggestive uptake. Exclusion criteria were image acquisition at less than 2 h (99mTc-3,3-diphosphono-1,2-propanodicarboxylic acid, 99mTc-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate, and 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate) or less than 1 h (99mTc-pyrophosphate) after tracer injection and if patients’ imaging and clinical data could not be linked. Ground truth annotation was derived from centralised core-lab consensus reading of at least three independent experts (CN, TT-W, and JN). An AI system for detection of cardiac amyloidosis-associated high-grade cardiac tracer uptake was developed using data from one centre (Austria) and independently validated in the remaining centres. A multicase, multireader study and a medical algorithmic audit were conducted to assess clinician performance compared with AI and to evaluate and correct failure modes. The system's prognostic value in predicting mortality was tested in ...