Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
An integrated environmental risk assessment framework for coal-fired power plants: A fuzzy logic approach.
Item request has been placed!
×
Item request cannot be made.
×
Processing Request
- المؤلفون: Bartan A;Bartan A; Kucukali S; Kucukali S; Ar I; Ar I; Baris K; Baris K
- المصدر:
Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis [Risk Anal] 2023 Mar; Vol. 43 (3), pp. 530-547. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Mar 16.- نوع النشر :
Journal Article- اللغة:
English - المصدر:
- معلومة اضافية
- المصدر: Publisher: Blackwell Publishers Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 8109978 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1539-6924 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 02724332 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Risk Anal Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE; MEDLINE
- بيانات النشر: Publication: 2002- : Malden, MA : Blackwell Publishers
Original Publication: New York : Plenum Press, c1981- - نبذة مختصرة : This study quantifies the environmental risk of a coal-fired thermal power plant during operation by using environmental monitoring data, site surveys, and documented evidence. The following criteria are assessed: emissions (CO, SO
2 , NOx , PM10 ), impact on aquatic ecosystem (fish protection at cooling water intake and cooling water discharge temperature), and waste management (fly ash and bottom ash). Fuzzy sets were defined for each criterion, taking environmental regulatory context as an expert judgment. A survey was conducted with multiple stakeholders to determine the relative importance of risk factors. The survey results showed that the most concerned risks are SO2 and NOx emissions. The proposed method estimates the risk of each environmental criterion separately and then accumulates them into an environmental risk index (ERI). Accordingly, we assessed the Catalagzi coal-fired power plant, which has been in operation on the Black Sea coast in northwestern Turkey. For this case study, the ERI resulted in a value of 0.78 (on a scale of 0-1), showing high environmental risk to the facility. Moreover, the applicability of the proposed framework was tested in several existing coal-fired power plants using simultaneous measurements. All studied coal-fired power plants in Turkey have unacceptable pollutants (PM10 , SO2 , and NOx ) concentration levels indicating high health risk potential. The application of the integrated environmental risk assessment framework showed that new environmental regulations are needed in Turkey to specify more strict emission limits and to monitor CO2 , fine particulate matter emissions, cooling water discharge, and fish protection at cooling water intake.
(© 2022 Society for Risk Analysis.) - References: Ak, M., Kentel, E., & Kucukali, S. (2016). A fuzzy logic tool to evaluate low-head hydropower technologies at the outlet of wastewater treatment plants. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 727-737.
Albalawi, O. H., Houshyar, A., & White, B. E. (2020). Developing a quantitative model to evaluate power plants based on their environmental impact. The Electricity Journal, 33, 10677.
Alden Lab. (2020). Optimization studies, the 316(b) Rule, and how it affects you. https://www.aldenlab.com/blog/optimization-studies-316b-rule-and-how-it-affects-you.
Alp, A., Akyuz, A., & Kucukali, S. (2020). Ecological impact scorecard of small hydropower plants in operation: An integrated approach. Renewable Energy, 162, 1605-1617.
Akyuz, E. (2017). Cumulative impact of the proposed coal-fired thermal power plants on air quality in Çanakkale province (Unpublished MSc dissertation, Istanbul Technical University).
Akyuz, E., & Kaynak, B. (2019). Use of dispersion model and satellite SO2 retrievals for environmental impact assessment of coal-fired power plants. Science of the Total Environment, 689(1), 808-819.
Alkan, M., Yıldırım, Y., & Oruç, M. (2009). Detection of coal ash turbidity in marine environment using remote sensing. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 18, 2072-2078.
Arunraj, N. S., Mandal, S., & Maiti, J. (2013). Modeling uncertainty in risk assessment: An integrated approach with fuzzy set theory and Monte Carlo simulation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 55, 242-255.
Atilgan, B., & Azapagic, A. (2015). Life cycle environmental impacts of electricity from fossil fuels in Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 555-564.
Atilgan, B., & Azapagic, A. (2016). An integrated life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity generation in Turkey. Energy Policy, 93, 168-186.
Aydın, L. (2018). Effects of increasing indigenous coal share in Turkey's electricity generation mix on key economic and environmental indicators: An extended input-output analysis. Energy Exploration and Exploitation, 36(2), 230-245.
Baba, A., & Kaya, A. (2004). Leaching characteristics of fly ash from thermal power plants of Soma and Tunçbilek, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 91, 171-181.
Baris, K. (2011). The role of coal in energy policy and sustainable development of Turkey: Is it compatible to the EU energy policy? Energy Policy, 39, 1754-1763.
Baris, K. (2013). Assessing ventilation air methane (VAM) mitigation and utilization opportunities: A case study at Kozlu Mine, Turkey. Energy for Sustainable Development, 17(1), 13-23.
Baris, K., & Aydin, Y. (2020). Atmospheric monitoring systems in underground coal mines revisited: A study on sensor accuracy and location. International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Technology, 23(3), 1754-1763.
Barros, J. J. C., Coira, M. L., De la Cruz López, M. P., Del Caño Gochi, A., & Soares, I. (2020). Probabilistic multicriteria environmental assessment of power plants: A global approach. Applied Energy, 260, 114344.
Bartan, A. (2017). Development of environmental impact assessment for coal fired thermal power plants (Unpublished PhD dissertation, Gazi University).
Bartan, A., Kucukali, S., & Ar, I. (2017). Environmental impact assessment of coal power plants in operation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Energy Systems and Environmental Engineering (ASEE). 22. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20172200011.
Bekat, T., Erdogan, M., İnal, F., & Genc, A. (2012), Prediction of the bottom ash formed in a coal fired power plant using artificial neural networks, Energy, 45, 882-887.
Branche, E. (2011). Hydropower: The strongest performer in the CDM process, reflecting high quality of hydro in comparison to other renewable energy sources. In Proceedings of the Hydro 2011 Conference. Prag, Czech Republic.
Brito, M. P., & Dawson, I. G. J. (2020). Predicting the validity of expert judgments in assessing the impact of risk mitigation through failure prevention and correction. Risk Analysis, 40(10), 1928-1943.
Cox, E. (1995). Fuzzy logic for business and industry. Charles River Media.
Cui, X., Hong, J., & Gao, M. (2012). Environmental impact assessment of three coal-based electricity generation scenarios in China. Energy, 45, 952-959.
Del Caño, A., Pilar de la Cruz, M., Gómez, D., & Pérez, M. (2016). Fuzzy method for analysing uncertainty in the sustainable design of concrete structures. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 22, 924-935.
Dingman, S. L. (2009). Fluvial hydraulics. Oxford University Press.
Ehrenfeld, J., & Gertler, N. (1997). Industrial ecology in practice: The evolution of interdependence at Kalundborg. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 1(1), 67-79.
Erdal, Z. (2012). The role of infrastructure projects in socio-economic development: Case study of Geheyan dam (Unpublished MSc dissertation, Lund University).
EUAS. (2020). Electricity generation company of Turkey. https://www.euas.gov.tr.
EURACOAL (European Association for Coal and Lignite). (2020). Coal industry across Europe. European Association for Coal and Lignite.
EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). (2020). Cooling water intakes. https://www.epa.gov/cooling-water-intakes.
FLOW-3D. (2013). Mapping hydraulic zones of influence and thermal plumes: towards 316 compliance using Flow-3D. www.flow3d.com.
Frosio, G., Marchesi, E., & Papetti, L. L. (2020). Multi-criteria analysis for the assessment of the environmental and social impacts of hydropower plants: Review of the outcomes and critical points of a recent application. In Proceedings of the Hydro 2020 Conference, 27th April, Online.
Gokceoglu, C. (2021). Membership functions. In B. Daya Sagar, Q. Cheng, J. McKinley, & F. Agterberg (Eds.), Encyclopedia of mathematical geosciences. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26050-7_203-1.
Guttikunda, S. K., & Jawahar, P. (2014). Atmospheric emissions and pollution from the coal-fired thermal power plants in India. Atmospheric Environment, 92, 449-460.
Holman, J. P. (2012). Experimental methods for engineers (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Intranational Edition.
Hossain, M. N., Paul, S. K., & Hasan, M. M. (2015). Environmental impacts of coal mine and thermal power plant to the surroundings of Barapukuria, Dinajpur, Bangladesh. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187, 202.
Hubbard, D. W. (2020). The failure of risk management (2nd ed.), Wiley & Sons.
IEA (International Energy Agency). (2015). Coal medium term market report 2015 (Market analysis and forecasts to 2020). International Energy Agency.
IEA (International Energy Agency). (2020). World energy outlook 2020. International Energy Agency.
IPCC. (1996). Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories (volume 3.) - Greenhouse Gas Inventory Reference Manual. IPCC.
JRC (European Commission Joint Research Centre). (2017). Best available techniques reference document for large combustion plants. http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/.
Kalkreuth, W., Levandowski, J., Delgado, T., Scheffer, R., Maia, S. M., Peralba, M. C. R., & Barrionuevo, S. (2014). Evaluation of environmental impacts of the Figueira Coal-Fired Power Plant, Parana´, Brazil. Energy Exploration and Exploitation, 32(3), 423-469.
Karaca, F., & Anil, I., & Alagha, O. (2009). Long-range potential source contributions of episodic aerosol events to PM10 profile of a megacity. Atmospheric Environment, 43, 5713-5722.
Kimmelman, D. W. (2010). Infrastructure investing in the electric power sector. In M.D. Underhill (Ed.), The handbook of infrastructure investing (pp. 49-61). John Wiley & Sons.
Kreinovich, V., Kosheleva, O., & Shahbazova, S. N. (2018). Why triangular and trapezoid membership functions: A simple explanation. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Soft Computing. Baku, Azerbaijan.
Kucukali, S., & Cokgor, S. (2007). Fuzzy logic model to predict hydraulic jump aeration efficiency. Proceedings of The Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management, 160(4), 225-231.
Kucukali, S., & Baris, K. (2010). Turkey's short-term gross annual electricity demand forecast by fuzzy logic approach. Energy Policy, 38, 2438-2445.
Kucukali, S. (2010). Hydropower potential of municipal water supply dams in Turkey: A case study in Ulutan Dam. Energy Policy, 38(11), 6534-6539.
Kucukali, S. (2011). Risk assessment of river type hydropower plants by using fuzzy logic approach. Energy Policy, 39(10), 6683-6688.
Kucukali, S. (2014). Environmental risk assessment of small hydropower (SHP) plants: A case study for SHP plant on Filyos River. Energy for Sustainable Development, 19, 102-110.
Kucukali, S. (2015). Risk assessment in hydro energy projects: Learning from experts and data. In W.L. Filho (Ed.), Handbook of renewable energy (pp. 1-17). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Kucukali, S. (2016). Risk scorecard concept in wind energy projects: An integrated approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, 975-987.
Kumar, R., Kaushik, C. P., & Agarwal, D. K. (2002). Site feasibility environmental impact assessment for the establishment of a coal-based thermal power plant at Dewas in Madhya Pradesh. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 59(5), 537-557.
Kentel, E., & Aral, M. M. (2005). 2D Monte Carlo versus 2D fuzzy Monte Carlo health risk assessment. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 19(1), 86-96.
Kurtulus, B. (2012). High resolution numerical simulation of sulphur-dioxide emission from a power plant building. Building Simulator, 5, 135-146.
Lawrence, S., & Dickson, P. (2010) Clean energy infrastructure. In M.D. Underhill (Ed.), The handbook of infrastructure investing (pp. 111-130). John Wiley & Sons.
Li, H. L., Huang, G. H., & Zou, Y. (2008). An integrated fuzzy-stochastic modelling approach for assessing health-impact risk from air pollution. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 22, 789-803.
Li, J., Huang, G. H., Zeng, G. M., Maqsood, I., & Huang, Y. F. (2007). An integrated fuzzy-stochastic modelling approach for risk assessment of groundwater contamination. Journal of Environmental Management, 82(2), 173-188.
Loh, T. Y., Brito, M. P., Bose, N., Xu, J., & Tenekedjiev, K. (2020). Fuzzy system dynamics risk analysis (FuSDRA) of autonomous underwater vehicle operations in the Antarctic. Risk Analysis, 40(4), 818-841.
Martins, M. R., Pestana, M. A., Bose, N., Xu, J., & Droguett, E. A. L. (2020). A methodology for assessing the probability of occurrence of undesired events in the Tiete-Parana inland waterway based on expert opinion. Risk Analysis, 40(6), 1279-1301.
Matbouli, Y. T., Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., & Karray, F. (2014). A fuzzy logic approach to assess, manage, and communicate carcinogenic risk. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 20(6), 1687-1707.
Melikoglu, M. (2018). Clean coal technologies: A global to local review for Turkey. Energy Strategy Reviews, 22, 313-319.
Mermet, S. R., & Gehant, B. (2011). Risk management for hydroelectric power plants. In Proceedings of the Hydro 2011 Conference. Prague, Czech Republic.
Mokhtar, M. M., Hassim, M. H., & Taib, R. M. (2014). Health risk assessment of emissions from a coal-fired power plant using AERMOD modelling. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 92, 476-485.
Mund, J. (2004). Applied risk analysis: Moving beyond uncertainty in business. Wiley Finance.
Munawer, M. E. (2018). Human health and environmental impacts of coal combustion and post-combustion wastes. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 17(2), 87-96.
Oberschelp, C., Pfister, S., Raptis, C. E., & Hellweg, S. (2019). Global emission hotspots of coal power generation. Nature Sustainability, 2(2), 113.
Raj, D., & Maiti, S. K. (2020). Risk assessment of potentially toxic elements in soils and vegetables around coal-fired thermal power plant: A case study of Dhanbad, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192, 699.
Rastogi, A., & Gabbar, H. A. (2013). Fuzzy-logic-based safety verification framework for nuclear power plants. Risk Analysis, 33(6), 1128-1145.
Rosen, M. A., Bulucea, C. A., Mastorakis, N. A., Bulucea, C. A., Jeles, C. A., & Brindusa, C. C. (2015). Evaluating the thermal pollution caused by wastewaters discharged from a chain of coal-fired power plants along a river. Sustainability, 7, 5920-5943.
Pfenninger, S., & Keirstead, J. (2015). Renewables, nuclear or fossil fuels? Scenarios for Great Britain's power system considering costs, emissions and energy security. Applied Energy, 152, 83-93.
Pike, R. (2010). Scenario-building techniques for improved risk management. In J. Reuvid (Ed.), Managing business risk: A practical guide to protecting your business, (pp. 17-22). Kogan Page.
Safdarnejad, S. M., Tuttle, J. F., & Powell, K. M. (2019). Dynamic modeling and optimization of a coalfired utility boiler to forecast and minimize NOx and CO emissions simultaneously. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 124, 62-79.
Saługa, P. W., Szczepańska-Woszczyna, K., Miśkiewicz, R., & Chłąd, M. (2020). Cost of equity of coal-fired power generation projects in Poland: Its importance for the management of decision-making process. Energies, 13, 4833.
Say, N. P. (2006). Lignite-fired thermal power plants and SO2 pollution in Turkey. Energy Policy, 34, 2690-2701.
Serbula, S. M., Kalinovic, T. S., Kalinovic, J. V., & Ilic, A. A. (2013). Exceedance of air quality standards resulting from pyro-metallurgical production of copper: A case study, Bor (Eastern Serbia). Environmental Earth Sciences, 68, 1989-1998.
SEÖS. (2011). Continuous emission measurement systems regulation. Ministry of Environment and Urbanization. [online]. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2011/10/20111012-6-1.pdf.
Society for Risk Analysis. (2015). Glossary. http://www.sra.org/sites/default/files/pdf/SRA_glossary_20150622.p.
Sözen, A., İhsan, A., & Özdemir, A. (2010). Assessment of operational and environmental performance of the thermal power plants in Turkey by using data envelopment analysis. Energy Policy, 38(10), 6194-6203.
Shepard, R. B. (2005). Quantifying environmental impact assessments using fuzzy logic. Springer.
Steinmann, Z. J. N, Venkatesh, A., Hauck, M., Schipper, A. M., Karuppiah, R., Laurenzi, I. J., & Huijbregts, M. A. J. et al. (2014). How to address data gaps in life cycle inventories-a case study on CO2 emissions from coal electricity. Environmental Science & Technology, 48, 5282-5289.
Steinmann, Z. J. N., Hauck, M., Karuppiah, R., Laurenzi, I. J., & Huijbregts, M. A. J. et al. (2014). A methodology for separating uncertainty and variability in the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of coal-fueled power generation in the USA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19, 1146-1155.
Sushil, S., & Batra, V. S. (2006). Analysis of fly ash heavy metal content and disposal in three thermal power plants in India. Fuel, 85, 2676-2679.
Sueyoshi, T., & Goto, M. (2012). Environmental assessment on coal-fired power plants in U.S. north-east region by DEA non-radial measurement. Energy Economics, 50, 125-139.
Tanaka, K., & Nimura, T. (1996). An introduction to fuzzy logic for practical applications. Springer-Verlag.
Tajbakhsh, A., & Hassini, E. (2018). Evaluating sustainability performance in fossil-fuel power plants using two-stage data envelopment analysis. Energy Economics, 74, 154-178.
TEIAS. (2020). Electricity generation-transmission statistics of Turkey 2018. Turkish Electricity Transmission Co. https://www.teias.gov.tr/tr-TR/turkiye-elektrik-uretim-iletim-istatistikleri/.
TUIK. (2013) National greenhouse gas inventory report 1990-2012. Turkish Statistical Institute. [online] https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/iklim/editordosya/NIR_TUR_2012.pdf.
Turhan, S., Parmaksız, A., Yüksel, A., Köse, A., Arıkan, İ. H., & Yücel, B. (2010). Radiological characteristics of pulverized fly ashes produced in Turkish coal-burning thermal power plants. Fuel, 89(12), 3892-3900.
Venkatesh, A., Jaramillo, P., Griffin, W. M., & Matthews, H. S. (2012). Implications of near-term coal power plant retirement for SO2 and NOX and life cycle GHG emissions. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(18), 9838-9845.
Vardar, N., & Yumurtaci, Z. (2010). Emissions estimation for lignite-fired power plants in Turkey. Energy Policy, 38, 243-252.
Verma, S. K., Masto, R. E., Gautam, S., Choudhury, D. P., Ram, L. C., Maiti, S. K., & Maity, S. (2015). Investigations on PAHs and trace elements in coal and its combustion residues from a power plant. Fuel, 162, 138-147.
Vujic, J., Antic, P. D., & Vukimirovic, Z. (2012). Environmental impact of and cost analysis of coal versus nuclear power: The U. S. case. Energy, 45(1), 31-42.
Wang, T. (2019). Coal-fired power plants emission standards. In Zhang, Y., Wang, T., Pan, W.P., & Romero, C.E. (Eds.), Advances in ultra-low emission control technologies for coal-fired power plants (pp. 25-38). Elsevier.
Welch, E. B., & Jacoby, J. M. (2004). Pollutant effects in freshwater: Applied limnology. (3rd ed.). Spon Press.
Zeydan, O., & Wang, Y. (2019). Using MODIS derived aerosol optical depth to estimate ground-level PM2.5 concentrations over Turkey. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 10(5), 1565-1576.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353. - Contributed Indexing: Keywords: coal-fired power plant; environmental monitoring; environmental risk index; fuzzy logic; turkey
- الموضوع: Date Created: 20220317 Date Completed: 20230320 Latest Revision: 20230320
- الموضوع: 20230320
- الرقم المعرف: 10.1111/risa.13908
- الرقم المعرف: 35297076
- المصدر:
حقوق النشر© 2024، دائرة الثقافة والسياحة جميع الحقوق محفوظة Powered By EBSCO Stacks 3.3.0 [353] | Staff Login
حقوق النشر © دائرة الثقافة والسياحة، جميع الحقوق محفوظة
No Comments.